±«Óătv

Measuring social development – WJECHow do we measure social development?

Social development refers to the way society is changing. Geographers always want to know if people’s lives are changing, in what way they're changing and if the change is for the better. Development is a continuum scale which is dynamic and forever changing. Countries and people can be at different stages of the development continuum.

Part of GeographySocial development

How do we measure social development?

When measuring social development, there are many possible indicators to consider. Often, the use of life expectancy (health) and adult literacy rate (education) are two reliable indicators which paint a picture of how socially developed countries are. From these figures we are able to reach many conclusions, as well as measure progress over time.

For example, in South Africa the percentage of the population who had no formal schooling in 1996 was 19.1 per cent, but had dropped massively to 8.7 per cent in 2011. This suggests that more South African children are being educated.

When assessing social development we must also consider gender where there are often massive differences.

Using data to measure development

Within geography, a range of and historical data may be presented in a number of ways. Commonly maps, graphs and tables of information are presented for analysis.

Using maps

Choropleth maps are colour-coded maps which show a range of values, and are very valuable tools in geography. The map of India shows the average life expectancy in 2016 across the Indian regions. The darker regions are those with the highest life expectancy, the lighter colours are those regions with the lowest life expectancy.

A choropleth map of India showing average life expectancy in 2016.

Tables of information

A table of information also allows us to reach conclusions about how developed a country is. The tables show another measure of health which can be useful – . Every country has managed to reduce the number of children dying before their first birthday. However, the tables also indicate that the figures for countries are much higher than South Asian countries, which suggests that sub-Saharan Africa is still less developed than South Asia.

1985199520052015
Gambia91715748
Kenya63725436
Mali1441259775
Malawi1471227143
Gambia
198591
199571
200557
201548
Kenya
198563
199572
200554
201536
Mali
1985144
1995125
200597
201575
Malawi
1985147
1995122
200571
201543
1985199520052015
Bangladesh118815131
India101785638
Pakistan115978066
Sri Lanka2517128
Bangladesh
1985118
199581
200551
201531
India
1985101
199578
200556
201538
Pakistan
1985115
199597
200580
201566
Sri Lanka
198525
199517
200512
20158

Using graphs

Graphs can be both simple and complex, but unlike a table they are able to provide a simple visual relationship between different development indicators. The scatter graph below shows the relationship between life expectancy (health), and income per person (wealth), of every country in the world. This graph shows a trend or pattern. Generally, the higher the income the higher the life expectancy. There are also in the data, eg South Africa’s life expectancy is much lower than expected and does not fit the trend.

A scatter graph comparing the life expectancy and income relationship of every country in the world.
Figure caption,
A scatter graph comparing the life expectancy and income relationship of every country in the world. When reading a scatter graph it is always important to identify its correlation