±«Óãtv

±«Óãtv BLOGS - Tom Fordyce
« Previous | Main | Next »

How Chris Hoy's life turned upside down

Tom Fordyce | 18:05 UK time, Tuesday, 30 December 2008

Four months on from three gold medals, the numbers keep adding up for Chris Hoy.

Two sportsman of the year awards, three enforced changes to his mobile phone number, eight new sponsorship deals, more than 30 public appearances, 12,000 hands shaken, at least as many autographs signed - .

"I've got a shorter signature now," he admits. "It's just a 'C' and an 'H' now with a squiggle in between. I reckon I can do it in less than a second."

It's strange to think that, this time a year ago, Hoy could stroll from his flat in Salford to the without being recognised by a single person.

Not any more. Now even popping into the supermarket for a pint of milk can take hours.

hoyblog1.jpg

"I'd had the experience of , and I thought I knew what it was like after an Olympic Games - but this has been on a totally different scale," he says.

"Everything takes longer now, like coming to training - say the track session started at 2.00pm, I used to come in 15 minutes before, have time to go to the workshop, pick up my bike, get the toolbag, go to the track centre, put my skinsuit on, on the track for 2.00pm for the warm-up.

"Now I have to come in earlier - if there's a school group there, they'll want pictures and autographs. It's really nice, but you have to plan ahead, otherwise you're late for training.

"Even on holiday in Thailand they knew who I was. Nothing is quite as simple as it used to be."

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions


As a cyclist - he describes himself as a "minority sportsman" - Hoy expected to go through life in relative anonymity. All that has now changed.

Prime Ministers and royalty request his presence. MPs discuss his training regime in Parliament. Almost twice as many people vote for him as than any other contender.

Hoy is not the sort of chap to complain, but the way his life has changed since those dramatic August afternoons in the Laoshan Velodrome has clearly caused him headaches.

"You have no time to yourself," he says. "You can't have a quiet day and do your own thing.

"Normally on a rest or recovery day I can sit around the house or go into town and have a coffee, or catch up with a friend, but every spare minute is taken up with 'can you just give this journalist a quick call", or 'can you cut a ribbon over here', or 'can you do this endorsement, or dinner, or charity event'.

"It's amazing to be in such demand, and it's very flattering, but at the same time you need time to just sit down, relax and switch off," he says, on a day when most of his morning has been taken up with media interviews.

Even before the knighthood he was the poster-boy for Britain's successes in Beijing, the barnstorming, record-breaking hero with legs the size of a cartoon superhero's and a golden aura of invincibility.

Now, as Sir Chris Hoy, the spotlight will become even brighter.

It's an irony not lost on him that one of the consequences of his cycling success has been less time to do exactly that - cycle.

"I've been desperate to get back on the bike, and that's been the problem," he says.

"Coming back down to Manchester for the World Cup just confirmed it. I was desperate to be in the pits warming up, on the track racing. I was doing a bit of commentary and enjoyed that, but it's nothing like being in there yourself.

"Getting away to Perth in early January - that's what I'm looking forward to. Peace and quiet, getting my head down and really getting some good hard work done in a nice environment."

hoyblog2.jpg

A few minutes after we finish talking, Hoy wheels his track bike out onto the boards and, after a gradual warm-up, thrashes out a succession of brutal laps behind the accelerating derny.

It's an astounding display of speed, the boards rumbling like thunder as he hammers round the tight banking, legs pumping, eyes out on stalks, mouth open in pain.

"The lactic sessions never get any easier," he admits.

"Every time you do it it feels like the hardest thing you've ever done, and you think that there must be something wrong, that it shouldn't feel that bad, that it feels awful, that you're going to die.

"You're lying there on the ground thinking you must be seriously ill.

"Then 15 minutes later you come out of it and think, ach, what was I worried about, that was fine - and you forget all about it. You've got this short-term memory loss for pain, and you get back up and do another one.

"You don't enjoy the pain at all, but what you do enjoy is finishing it and knowing that you've given it everything you've got, and that it'll make a difference.

"And it gives you such mental strength - when you get to the racing and you've pushed yourself that hard, you know you can deal with it. You know that your opponents have trained hard too, but you know they haven't trained harder than you, and that gives you a big weapon in your armoury."

Hoy does not expect to be riding at his very best next year. Too much training time has been lost in the post-Olympic maelstrom, and in any case the plan was always that 2009 would be a quieter year.

The world championships take place in March and although he'll be training as hard as he can, he acknowledges he may not win gold - "You can't expect to be a world beater, to be where you were, without putting the same time and effort in."

But potential rivals should think twice before counting any chickens. Hoy still believes he can go faster - a lot faster.

"The important thing is winning in London - I've got a four-year plan, not a one-year plan. And because I've been doing new events, I'm still on a very steep learning curve both tactically and technically.

"When will I peak? August 2012, I reckon. And if I can make it to London, it's not long to the Commonwealths in Glasgow.

"If I can finish on a home Olympics and a home Commonwealths, that would be a good way to go out."

Sir Chris Hoy, competing at the , in front of a Scottish crowd?

He laughs. "Yeah. I couldn't complain about that."

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Just a quick auestion Tom;

    Do you think that the handing out of so many awards for sportspeople is de-valueing the awards??

    I first thought this when the Queen honoured the Ashes cricket team but now it all seems a bit out of hand. There are many people who work hard their whole lives and dedicate a lot to their community that get overlooked because they are not in the limelight.



  • Comment number 2.

    Giving awards to successful sports people who are role models to the next generation is no more devaluing of the awards, than it is when they are given to contributors of political parties and the legion of hangers-on that surround royalty.

  • Comment number 3.

    HealeysHairPiece;

    I think that you misunderstand me, i am not having a go at the sportspeople for the achievments as i think that they have been immence.

    My point is, there are people out there who find and develop these young minds, be it in sports, Science, Charity or other, that are constantly overlooked.

    the last few years of the new years honour list has been largly dedicated to sports.

  • Comment number 4.

    I suppose it depends on what you view the purpose of the awards as. The difficulty is that if Hoy now does years of charity work, how is he to be rewarded? They can hardly make him a Lord (as that is a political appointment).

    In my view, a knighthood should be reserved as a reward for a lifetime of working beyond the call of duty in a particular field, and in doing so helping others. It is too late now to make that call, as the likes of Kelly Holmes and Hoy have already set a precedent. I do not mean to devalue their achievments at all, they are undoubtedly phenomenal, but where can they go from here?

    A counter argument would be that having got the title, it is their duty to live up to it, and dedicate themselves to being a role model to the rest of us, and to helping those who have not had their opportunities. However I think that a CBE should suffice for that, and then it could be upgraded to a knighthood following years of selfless service.

    Chris Hoy is, and doubtless will continue to be a wonderful role model and a perfect professional, and he deserves all the praise that he is getting, in my view. If he wins more golds in London though, he will have to be left out of the honours list, as there is no further for him to go, which is a shame.

  • Comment number 5.

    Chris who??, until the summer Joe Public had never heard of him.

    Kenny Dalglish not only one of the greatest footballers of all time who won countless honours as player and manager and now doing a lot for charity is still waiting for his Knighthood. Phil Neal the most decorated British footballer with winner medals which included 8 league titles and FOUR European Cup winners medals, and don't get me started on Bob Paisley the most successful British manager off all time......................

  • Comment number 6.

    Forgot to mention about what Dalglish and his wife did after the events of Hillsborough, helping to support family's who lost loved ones.

  • Comment number 7.

    You're quite right, davejjt.

    Why we don't give knighthoods to all the Liverpool FC players, as a matter of course, is beyond me.

  • Comment number 8.

    Phil Neal may not be the kind of role model who ought to get the big gongs:


  • Comment number 9.

    I am saying Fergie and Busby got Knighthoods so why not Dalglish and Paisley ( and why not shankly ). Regarding Phil Neal I am sure other " Sirs" have done alot worse.

  • Comment number 10.

    lol

  • Comment number 11.

    A petition was sent to No 10 a couple of years back about awarding a posthumous knighthood to Bob Paisley but this got nowhere. It is sad that a man who achieved so much has not been rewarded in the same way as others.

    Back to Chris Hoy though, let us not forget that he won Olympic Gold at 2 games, not just one, and has won a multitude of other titles. If this is not down to years of dedication then I don't know what is. To achieve what he has into his thirties is phenomenal.

    Now, the Daily Mirror campaign to get a knighthood for Bruce Forsyth - that would be devaluing the honours system. Honours have always been privately discussed then awarded and such a blatant public campaign can only do one thing and that is backfire. Let us not forget he got his CBE in 2006 - that should suffice for a man who should have been put out to pasture a long time ago by the Beeb.

  • Comment number 12.

    A knighthood for Brucie?

    That would be nice to see; to see, nice.

    Sorry, but someone had to.


    Seriously, congratulations on a well deserved MBE for Marina Dalglish.

  • Comment number 13.

    Chris Hoy has trained quietly and with great purpose in order to win a gold medal for himself and his country. Chris and the team lifted the spirits of the nation and made us proud to be British. We love our sport and we love to see our team(s) win fairly. We pride ourselves on effort, flair and fair play.

    It is difficult to decide who should get what national award, or who should or shouldn't be knighted. Chris is deserving of something, and maybe the knighthood is the answer.
    On the quesiton of those overlooked, I would agree that Bob Paisley does deserve a knighthood and I am surprised that Ronnie Corbett and Bruce Forsythe have still to recieve this award. Oh and I could do with a CBE for being a taxpayer since I was 15 - don't see why my efforts are anyless that sitting on a bike and peddling fast or kicking a ball about or wearling a wig and shouting 'Good Game'

  • Comment number 14.

    Well done to Chris Hoy on his knighthood, but what has Bruce Forsyth got to do to get a knighthood!!!

    At the start of the year nobody knew who Hoy was, and now he gets knighted for his services to sport? Forsyth on the other hand has been on TV for years and gets no recognition. MADNESS!

  • Comment number 15.

    Forsyth v Hoy? Now that's a blog discussion I never thought I'd start...

    For the record, I'd favour Hoy in a bike race and Brucie in the tap-dancing.

  • Comment number 16.

    The list has been based on what Gordon Brown thinks will do best for the Labour Party, not necessarily who actually eserves the honour.
    Why should Rebecca Adlington get an OBE and Lewis Hamilton get only an MBE. I am sure Ellie's MBE was for the public vote, otherwise she would have been awarded nothing. But why not parity with Rebecca - they both won 2 gold medals.

    Do not get me wrong, Chris Hoy richly deserved his knighthood.

  • Comment number 17.

    I think most people will agree that Paisley, Clough and Shankly not getting Knighthoods was a travesty. But you have to remember the government at the time they should've been honoured (as its them who ultimately decide who gets the biggies) weren't exactly too keen on football. And even less so on openly socialist football managers. Even with Ferguson's achievements, the Thatcher and Major's governments would never have given him a staunch labour supporter such as Ferguson a Knighthood.

    As Dalglish and his wife. King Ken has already been honoured. And his wife is actually on the list for this year for her charity work.

    If Phil Neal deserves a Knighthood based simply on the honours he won, then Davejj (even as a Liverpool fan) has to agree that Ryan Giggs should get one too. By his criteria, 10 league titles and two european cups should be enough.

  • Comment number 18.

    The Daily Mash sums it all up nicely..



    OBE's, MBE's...fine.. But knighthoods should be reserved for the truly deserving. Not sports stars OR managers OR bank officials !

  • Comment number 19.

    Plenty of people who don't get knighthoods deserve them and there are some that get them that probably don't deserve them. Sir Chris certainly deserves his. As far as footballers go they get plenty more compensation. Chris Hoy is essentially the fastest (velodrome) cyclist on earth.

  • Comment number 20.

    Hoy achieved what no brit could co for 100 years. So it was a first for queeny. Becky deserved more for breaking the 19 year-old world record of Janet Evans in the 800 m final(The oldest record in the olympics in the olympics until becky beat it). Adlington is Britain's first Olympic swimming champion since 1988, the first British swimmer to win two Olympic gold medals since 1908 and is Great Britain's most successful Olympic swimmer in 100 years. So given that a brit has won the formula one numerous times in those 100 years both deserved more than Hamilton. The next footballer/manager who gets "sired" is going to have to win the world cup. I don't even think Fergie should be a sir. As football became more about the money it lost it's credentials to be a sport of genuine achievement. You would expect the richest to win everything (MANU, Chelsea, Liverpool). If Hull won the premiership it would be a much bigger achievement than any of the big budget teams winning it.

  • Comment number 21.

    Mel0dymaker, only one Formula One world champion has ever been knighted, Sir Jackie Stewart and I think part of that was due to the safety reforms pushed through (If I was to speak of someone I also believe was worthy of a knighthood it would be Prof Sid Watkins, who is responsible for the drive to get many F1 circuits up to increased safety levels through the 70's and 80's.

    I believe the problem that arises whenever these lists are announced is whether being good at something is in your eyes is worthy of an honour. I'm Hoy's knighthood will be for services to cycling or something and I don't know enough about him to go making accusations that may be false, however, on a more general scale, comes the question is being good at a sport worthy of such a high acolade and I probably speak of a great many of sports knights here and again it's hard to criticise. For instance, David Beckham as an example, earns a lot, but I get the impression that he also does a lot with his money. He's set up a soccer academy I believe and they'll be some that will give, but don't need their name up in lights. Now, whilst that school might be a business venture, it is also giving something back. Whether it's a knightly pursuit, is another debate, but I don't believe overall whether someone becomes a knight should be wholly based on their achievements on the sporting field. The guy that trains children in his spare time each weekday night will always in my eye be more worthy than the sportsman who succeeds at what he does.

    But it's so grey I don't envy anyone deciding what everyone should get.

  • Comment number 22.

    Thats a joke, iam with you EIREBILLY. I now undertand why many big names from music to sport say no to this medals and knighthood and so on... most of them
    waste of time...

    People like Andrews Cole who won anything you can win in club football and like many other doing they job hard to be respected of what they do, are never mentioned.

    And now this guy go cycling in circle, turning left, left again, left again and left again. ( i go get a cup of tea, come back and never missed a damn thing), there he gest 3 golds... and his a hero. what about the real heros that were doing they profection for many years and succeed in the processe... I dont think I will remember him when this article is gone... will you?

  • Comment number 23.

    Why the hell are we givening these people knighthoods, it's about time we stood up as a nation and got rid of this corrupt give it all away to others goverment. £850 million to India for what.

    It's our boys coming back from the middle east and being treated no better than second class citizens that deserve these knighthoods, if these people had any courage they would give their awards back and tell the goverment were to stick them. That would be brave, but of course it won't happen

  • Comment number 24.

    I guess people are recognising a huge pair of legs then thinking who is that with huge legs that sprinters have.
    I would not know Chris Hoy from the old man of hoy but if I saw someone with outsized legs almost freaklike I would say who the heck is that, Oh its Chris Hoy.

  • Comment number 25.

    I am not taking anything away from Chris Hoy's acheivements but this is an award too far. There are so many sportsmen/women who have acheived a great deal more than him. Although he has done well, he does not deserve a knighthood.

  • Comment number 26.

    This is a problem that began with the England Cricket team. When you set the bar so low for awards ( and they were given for political reasons) then everything else has to follow on from that. Compare winning one game of cricket( not even a world cup ) against what was a weakened Australian team to the olympics then quite frankly a knighthood should have been given to all Olympic gold medallists (at least they achieved something notable ) and Chris Hoy should have been made a Lord.

    The England Rugby team deserved to get there awards because they did something extraordinary, however the England cricket team should have been made to give there's back what they achieved was ordinary and since then have ben appalling.

  • Comment number 27.

    captaintommyh I dont suppose you would like to enlighten us to who you believe has achieved more than Chris Hoy. The first Brit to win three golds in one olympics in nearly 100 yrs added to his world gold medals previous olympic medals and world records ,I cant think of too many.

    Chris Hoy deserves a Knighthood but it should have come when he retired from sports and not now. Blame the English cricket team for that.

  • Comment number 28.

    On the handout of honours, you can't win. Pilloried for not giving the 66 World Cup winners their dues until after the greatness of their achievements was recognised and howled at when you try to give the cricketers theirs after the Ashes (this win came following 3 years of success and now they’re solely judged on 3 years of decline).

    Our fantastic Olympians dedicate 4 years of their lives for a single Olympics, to bring both personal and reflective glory. I thought this year’s honours correctly gauged the scale of our sportsmen/women’s achievements and by considering their longevity reflected the stage in their career.
    I was equally delighted to see the recognition for Dave Brailsford and David Tanner.

    My one quibble – surely it should be Sir Ben Ainslie.

  • Comment number 29.

    Knighthoods are, rightly, for exceptional service over a prolonged period. Chris Hoy has won medals at three Olympics and by winning three at a single Olympics ensures that the bar remains sufficiently high so as not to devalue the honour. Ben Ainslie will, fingers crossed, be the next recipient in 2012 should he add another gold medal to his collection.

    People who say that such honours should not, on occasion, be given to sportsmen and women, utterly fail to grasp the inspirational and motivational role they play within society.

    We are all allowed to dream impossible dreams, and those that achieve theirs deserve our utmost adulation and respect.

  • Comment number 30.

    Hoy should not have been knighted yet. I suppose they had to after Dame Kelly Holmes

    Ian Botham did years of charity work before his knighthood. I think Hoy should have done the same before getting his.

    You can't argue with his achievement, but it basically sends out a message to the world that we are not very expectant of our sport, and when it does happen we get rather giddy

Ìý

±«Óãtv iD

±«Óãtv navigation

±«Óãtv © 2014 The ±«Óãtv is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.