±«Óãtv

±«Óãtv BLOGS - Test Match Special
« Previous | Main | Next »

India cashes in on Twenty20 global appeal

Anna Thompson - ±«Óãtv Sport journalist | 10:27 UK time, Wednesday, 20 February 2008

It does not take a genius to work out how mad India is for its cricket.

But a new international Twenty20 league, the Indian Premier League, has raised the stakes even higher with $800m (£411m) being spent on TV rights for a 59-game tournament in April, featuring eights teams comprising many of the world's top stars and young Indian players.

On Wednesday in Mumbai, the hotly contested for the players was held and hundreds of millions of dollars were flying around in a secure bidding process to capture the services of cricketers such as Mahendra Dhoni, who went to Chennai for $1.5m (£771,000), Australia's , who cost Hyderabad $1.35m (£694,000), and Sri Lanka veteran Sanath Jayasuriya, who Mumbai forked out $975,000 (£500,000) for.

It was like a high stakes fantasy cricket game with Monopoly money all rolled into one - except it was for real...

Check out the video here.

Although thousands of miles away in London, it was not hard to sense the excitement and chaos that was happening in India as we tried to convey this huge cricket story.

As we tried to get hold of ±«Óãtv contacts, they could hardly hear us on their mobile telephones because of the din being made by hundreds of fans and 300 journalists who had turned up to the auction.

And there was a real sense of anticipation as every so often, an IPL spokesman appeared from behind the closed doors to announce how much players had been sold for in the latest round of bidding.

Bollywood superstar Shahrukh Khan who owns the Kolkata team

±«Óãtv reporter Prachi Pinglay said: "The eight franchisees were in a huge room and exchanged smiles and greetings but the bidding was fiercely competitive.

"While the players were bought and sold at sometimes astronomical, sometimes at reserve base prices, it was the media centre that was stormy.

"With over 300 media persons from national as well as international press, the media frenzy compensated for any absence of fans for the Bollywood biggies."

Shahrukh Khan, a first time bidder who bought nine players - including Ishant Sharma for a whopping $950, 000 - told the press that by the end of the day he was almost getting addicted to bidding. He said the atmosphere at the auction was full of comraderie.

And liquor baron Vijay Mallya, who bought eight players - including Jacques Kallis at $900,000 - felt that everyone got what they wanted.

The ±«Óãtv's Rahul Tandon was also in the thick of the action and he told 5 Live the start of the auction had been delayed because the amount of fans and media outside meant that the rich businessmen and Bollywood stars who own the franchises could not get into the room on time.

The police were also called to quell the crowds which had gathered.

Tandon said: "The amount Dhoni went for was extraordinary as his list price was $400,000 but all eight teams wanted him and there was a bidding war.

"There is money coming to cricket here like the game has never seen before."

India was slow to embrace Twenty20 cricket initially but that all changed when they won the inaugural Twenty20 World Championship in South Africa in September and interest in the shortest format of the game suddenly exploded.

The Board for the Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) was then quick to catch on to the money that could be made and has hastily arranged the , with the International Cricket Council's blessing.

"Cricket is not just a sport here, it's a business. This is one of the world's fastest growing economies. If you want to get into this country with your product then get a cricket player to endorse it," Tandon added.

Pietersen would be a big draw in the IPL

England cricket fans can be forgiven for the IPL passing them by so far as no England players are involved in it because it clashes with the start of the county season and the English Test summer.

England all-rounder Andrew Flintoff is currently in India with the England Lions team as he continues his comeback from a fourth ankle operation and he has been amazed by the frenzy the IPL has generated.

He said: "It's hard not to follow it because it's in all the newspapers and television over here.

"But the IPL itself is not something I'm particularly interested in because it clashes with our English season."

Other players, including former New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming and all-rounder Scott Syris have announced their retirements in order to be able to play in the IPL.

And in the future, could the IPL's money talk even more?

The BCCI could ultimatey try to persuade the ICC to introduce a break in the international calendar to avoid direct competition with national boards and the England and Wales Cricket Board could have its arm twisted to allow England players to go.

But the ICC said on Wednesday the Future Tours Programme was sorted until 2012.

A spokesman for the Bangalore team said they would dearly love a player such as Kevin Pietersen in future seasons as he would be a big draw.

It will be very interesting to see what the next chapter in this new cricket phenomenon will bring.

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌýPost your comment

  • 1.
  • At 02:03 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • anton wrote:

I don't think $800 miilion equates to £411,000, more like £411 million.

  • 2.
  • At 02:22 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Mike L wrote:

Its going to be interesting when they start bidding for the English players - about £8.97 for Collingwood?

Also, I know the dollar is week at the moment but if you could tell me the currency exchange you can get $800m for £411,000 that would be most appreciated!

  • 3.
  • At 02:24 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • George wrote:

zinzay should be playing in it.

  • 4.
  • At 02:24 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • worcsn wrote:

Who does all the money go to??

  • 5.
  • At 02:27 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Sheroz Ilyas wrote:

As a very huge cricket fan I believe the whole meaning and passion behind cricket is disappearing. As a pakistan fan I love to watch the cricket on TV and witness the skill and determination behind the players. This phenomenon will only bring an end to what cricket really stands for. Tears come to my eyes watching players rough it out on the pitch and making this into a money making business it ridiculous. CRICKET IS NOT A BUSINESS IT IS A PASSION.

  • 6.
  • At 02:29 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Laneyboy wrote:

Fascinating development in the world of cricket. Packer rrevisited, but this time with even larger sums of money on offer.

Eventually, the ECB and the others will have to come into line and release players or risk the loss of leading cricketers to the Test arena.

I can imagine Kevin Pietersen choking on his three shredded wheat when he sees how much money is on offer.

I like the look of the Chennai team, and Mohali should be worth watching as well.

India in April is the place to be.

  • 7.
  • At 02:35 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Jarvis wrote:

Money talks and I bet Flintoff, Pieterson, Mustard and co will be playing in the IPL come next year. And who can blame them!! A lot of money for four weeks cricket if you ask me.

  • 8.
  • At 02:38 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • mark savage wrote:

Can anyone tell me why players such as darren gough and andy caddick havent signed up????

  • 9.
  • At 02:38 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Jarvis wrote:

Money talks and I bet Flintoff, Pieterson, Mustard and co will be playing in the IPL come next year. And who can blame them!! A lot of money for four weeks cricket if you ask me.

  • 10.
  • At 02:39 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • mark savage wrote:

Can anyone tell me why players such as darren gough and andy caddick havent signed up????

  • 11.
  • At 02:43 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Jarvis wrote:

Are you trying to tell me that come next year Flintoff, Pieterson, and company will not be playing in the IPL? Money talks and they will be there, have no doubts!!

  • 12.
  • At 02:44 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • sokhi wrote:

I've been following the player transfer all day on various internet sights and i'm amazed by the interest in it. Some of the prices have been crazy.
I'm personally looking forward to watching all these players play in april. (sony tv got the rights)
Its a shame english players will not be represented.

  • 13.
  • At 02:58 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • santokh wrote:

wow... can't wait

  • 14.
  • At 03:05 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • tony wrote:

hey i think its amazing .cricket was waiting for this revolution.the same thing happend in football with the epl .big bucks have been poured out by clubs to buy players to fulfill their ambitions for example abromovich with chelsea ,similarly in the ipl the more money u have the more stars you attract the more u win the more u earn back.

Oh my! Symonds, Gilchrist, Gibbs and AFRIDI in the same team! Watch out for some serious pyrotechnics.. I wonder who will top the sixes column amongst those four.. Bring it ON!

  • 16.
  • At 03:06 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Anna Thompson wrote:

...ooops I have corrected the amount!

  • 17.
  • At 03:06 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ian wrote:

Typical, I exchanged £400 for my holiday the other day and only got $749 the other day at an exchange of 1.87.

If only I had waited and used your exchange, by my calculations I could have got $778,589!

Come ±«Óãtv, spill the beans.


  • 18.
  • At 03:12 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Tom wrote:

The IPL is nowhere near the forefront of Flintoff's mind because he is nowhere near the forefront of theirs...

  • 19.
  • At 03:32 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Tim S wrote:

Collingwood is the best fielder in the world, just hit two scintillating knocks, one of them rewriting the English ODI history books and is a tidy bowler, so "£8.97" is a really silly comment, even if tongue in cheek.

The knocking of our players really beggars belief.

  • 20.
  • At 03:33 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Arunangshu Mukhopadhyay wrote:

Actually Mike England happen to be the only test playing nation with no representation in the IPL.77 players went under the hammer today,,only two remained unsold at the end of the day,Mohammad Yousuf of Pakistan and Ashwell Prince of South Africa.

  • 21.
  • At 03:49 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ravi Shankar wrote:

Is Cricket going the football way? Will there me more "club" matches than international matches in the future? The next 2-3 years will be quite interesting.

  • 22.
  • At 03:51 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Tim S wrote:

Collingwood is the best fielder in the world, just hit two scintillating knocks, one of them rewriting the English ODI history books and is a tidy bowler, so "£8.97" is a really silly comment, even if tongue in cheek.

The knocking of our players really beggars belief.

  • 23.
  • At 04:03 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Elton wrote:

what are you on about tom, i know for a fact that flintoff is very popular all around the world, and would be very welcome in the IPL.

  • 24.
  • At 04:04 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • whatwhatwhat92 wrote:

Mike L that was a pretty stupid comment in my opinion particularly in light of Collingwood smashing the fastest 50 by an Englishman this morning and being an integral part of last weeks win...

  • 25.
  • At 04:08 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Keepersgloves wrote:

The thing about this competition I'm most looking forward to is the Australians having to play each other. How will Hayden, Ponting and Hussey cope against the bowling of Lee, Bracken Warne and Magrath? It should be an indicator as to how good this current Aussie team really are now their not on the same team. Should be fun!

  • 26.
  • At 04:08 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Rip wrote:

The little m next to £411 stands for million. They are talking in $US.

£8.97 for Collingwood??!! Wouldn't pay £1

  • 27.
  • At 04:08 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • fatassflintoff wrote:

its funny how the players criticising the tournament are the ones no one would pay more than 5 dollars for. I doubt flintoff would be thinking of england if he was offered half a million

  • 28.
  • At 04:13 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • fatassflintoff wrote:

its funny how the players criticising the tournament are the ones no one would pay more than 5 dollars for. I doubt flintoff would be thinking of england if he was offered half a million

  • 29.
  • At 04:14 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Keepersgloves wrote:

The thing about this competition I'm most looking forward to is the Australians having to play each other. How will Hayden, Ponting and Hussey cope against the bowling of Lee, Bracken Warne and Magrath? It should be an indicator as to how good this current Aussie team really are now their not on the same team. Should be fun!

  • 30.
  • At 04:17 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Keepersgloves wrote:

The thing about this competition I'm most looking forward to is the Australians having to play each other. How will Hayden, Ponting and Hussey cope against the bowling of Lee, Bracken Warne and Magrath? It should be an indicator as to how good this current Aussie team really are now their not on the same team. Should be fun!

  • 31.
  • At 04:24 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • mark savage wrote:

WHY arnt players like darren gough and andy caddick, quality bowlers coming to the end of their careers considering playing

  • 32.
  • At 04:36 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Mark wrote:

Are there any plans for the tournament to be broadcast on any of the English speaking channels, ±«Óãtv, Sky, Setanta, I 've seen nothing advertised...

  • 33.
  • At 04:37 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • s s uppal wrote:

i've changed my mind, rather than watch all this cricket on tv i'm going to india for 44 days and experience as much of it as i can live. Will it be on sky?

  • 34.
  • At 04:43 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • s s uppal wrote:

i've changed my mind, rather than watch all this cricket on tv i'm going to india for 44 days and experience as much of it as i can live. Will it be on sky?

  • 35.
  • At 04:48 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Disgusted of Lord's wrote:

This is yet another nail in the coffin for the beautiful gentleman's game of cricket that we used to love.
Cricket is selling its soul in the same way that football has done. They should call this new business CrickBall. Note that I did not refer to it as a game or sport for it is not primarily a game or a sport but a money-making enterprise.

  • 36.
  • At 04:51 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Jiji Raphael wrote:

had the English players been available flintoff peiterson and collingwood w'd have been in great demand

The Kolkata, Mohali, Chennai and Hyderabad teams look the strongest. But the thing with Hyd is that they will either make 300 in 20 overs or will be 10/4 after 2 with Gilly, Symonds, Gibbs and Afridi.

Bangalore have built a test team. Can you imagine Jaffer, my favourite Rahul Dravid, Kallis and Chanderpaul all in the same team for a T20? Atleast Dravid's strike rate over the last 4 years has got better and better but the other 3........

  • 38.
  • At 04:56 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Disgusted of Lord's wrote:

This is yet another nail in the coffin for the beautiful gentleman's game of cricket that we used to love.
Cricket is selling its soul in the same way that football has done. They should call this new business CrickBall. Note that I did not refer to it as a game or sport for it is not primarily a game or a sport but a money-making enterprise.

  • 39.
  • At 04:56 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Mike Wright wrote:

Indian is the most happening country in the world these days...and it fgor sure the place to be when players like Symonds, Gilchrist, Gibbs ,dhoni, afridi r for that sake name any one who can hit the ball out to the parking lot under a single roof...its for sure going to have a very big impact on world Cricket..

Indian is the most happening country in the world these days...and it fgor sure the place to be when players like Symonds, Gilchrist, Gibbs ,dhoni, afridi r for that sake name any one who can hit the ball out to the parking lot under a single roof...its for sure going to have a very big impact on world Cricket..

To people questioning whether the matches will be shown in the UK, the answer is yes. But not on Sky Sports, it will be on Set Max, which is an Indian channel available in the UK, Sky channel 800 but you will have to pay for it.

  • 42.
  • At 05:31 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Sairaj Menon wrote:

Waiting for the championship to start..........

  • 43.
  • At 05:41 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • ravishankar wrote:

I am from India and I am ashamed of the mindless show of economic muscle on display. Imagine somebody like Yousuf Pathan (he has played ONE international T20 match) getting bid for 2 crore Rupees (500,000 USD) against somebody like Ricky Ponting (however unpopular he might be in India). So, what does it show? It shows that Cricket, the dear old Cricket of Gundappa Viswanath is going to dogs and even Gods cannot help it!

  • 44.
  • At 05:42 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • ravishankar wrote:

I am from India and I am ashamed of the mindless show of economic muscle on display. Imagine somebody like Yousuf Pathan (he has played ONE international T20 match) getting bid for 2 crore Rupees (500,000 USD) against somebody like Ricky Ponting (however unpopular he might be in India). So, what does it show? It shows that Cricket, the dear old Cricket of Gundappa Viswanath is going to dogs and even Gods cannot help it!

  • 45.
  • At 05:53 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Alex Hunter wrote:

Collingwood for £8.97m? Do you know anything about cricket mate?

  • 46.
  • At 05:56 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Keith Tozier wrote:

Indian companies are growing in size and are doing very weel and are contributing to the boom in cricket money. Hope this is good for the game in the long run.

  • 47.
  • At 06:47 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Gurpal wrote:

Just to clarify a couple of points. There are only 4 non-India players allowed per team so it makes sense that there would be a premium to buy Indian players. With so many world-class cricketers in the pool, I wonder how long the 4-local-Indian-under 22 rule will stay for?

I'm quite happy with the Mohali team who actually paid big for bowlers!

Spare a thought for poor Ashwell Prince though. It's bad enough being picked last in school, but being the only player not to have been picked must have hurt his pride (Yousuf has outstanding contract problems so was just ignored). At least he'll get paid still though, and he now has 6 weeks off.

  • 48.
  • At 06:49 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Rich Davis wrote:

I wonder how well the rest of the world will view this enterprise when they realise they have been usurped by sub continent money. people are already forecasting changes to the seasons and touring schedules. we are watching the death of test cricket. Cricketers are already beginning to resemble their footballing counterparts where the recieving of obscene amounts of money grants them godlike ststus. I beleive that this IPL will merely upset the future of cricket then die away as there is no home market for it in the majority of test playing nations. The whole ethos of cricket following starts with support for your own home team and th4en widens to appreciate skill from other teams players, you need the home support before you get the rest and manufactured franchises will be as moveable as american football franchises.

  • 49.
  • At 06:49 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Harvester1972 wrote:

Surely Hyderabad have gone over the $5m budget?

  • 50.
  • At 07:19 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ravi Balkish wrote:

It is utterly disgusting this IPL money and its whole bullcrap

every one who has ever handled a bat or a cricket ball is offered a million - the worthless Bollywood trailer trash is awash with money and they are professing knowledge of a game they have no idea about

funny, Yuvraj who has a string of failures and Harbhajan who is so ordinary, get a million dollars each

any sensible cricket fan should stop watching these meaningless games

Ravi Balky

  • 51.
  • At 07:43 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • m clarke wrote:

Can I give you 400K for $800 million please... wow that is a good exchange rate.

Where is all this money going into the players pockets or the IPL?

Personally, I Think the England boys have missed out... not just on the money front but on the increased level of competition, with some of the best in the world playing together, what a great Spectacle can only be good for the evolution of the game.

To add to this, what a benefit, this can only make our own boys better...

Poor show from the BCCI. I wonder if they got some of the profits, would they would have had a different view?

I think it is great for the game and mindless show of silly economics in India. However, if the IPL was looking for press coverage to generate interest, good job.

  • 52.
  • At 07:47 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • m clarke wrote:

Can I give you 400K for $800 million please... wow that is a good exchange rate.

Where is all this money going into the players pockets or the IPL?

Personally, I Think the England boys have missed out... not just on the money front but on the increased level of competition, with some of the best in the world playing together, what a great Spectacle can only be good for the evolution of the game.

To add to this, what a benefit, this can only make our own boys better...

Poor show from the BCCI. I wonder if they got some of the profits, would they would have had a different view?

I think it is great for the game and mindless show of silly economics in India. However, if the IPL was looking for press coverage to generate interest, good job.

  • 53.
  • At 08:02 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • crickWillSuck wrote:

This whole excercise of turning the lovely game of cricket into a business will fall flat on it's behind.

Make no mistake. The passion you have so far experienced in the subcontinent and elsewhere has been National in character. I couldn't care less if Bradman played for Bangalore or a McDermott for Mumbai.

Real business people like Malya will absorb the losses but I can not say the same about those who made money on paychecks (Sharukh Khan etc.)

  • 54.
  • At 08:23 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Dr. Cajetan Coelho wrote:

In cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Jaipur and even Chandigarh one sees thousands of our Indian sisters and brothers spending their nights on pavements and in huts.

Proper hygiene, sanitation, two square meals a day, health care, roof on their heads and education are the need of the hour.

Cricketers and their all powerful sponsors could do a lot more to improve the quality of life of our less fortunate brethren in our country.

Let us wish our cricketers and their sponsors all the very best in their service to humanity.

  • 55.
  • At 08:36 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Destro wrote:

Whats kind of interesting is that Laxman actually gave up icon status to help his franchise bag the best players. Now like IPL or not such gestures make this new business worth watching. Well for those who hate this format for bringing ordinary players against good players, I think it should be an inspiration to play beside sportstars whether you deserve it or not. The sportsars don't care who they play with as long as they bag money. I see nothing wrong with it. The only thing I see wrong is an over crowded schedule.

  • 56.
  • At 09:01 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Glynne Williams wrote:

Some commentators on this posting make huge assumptions about how fabulous it will be to bring together a bunch of big hitters/bowlers etc. just for a cricket jamboree which has limited shelf life.

Look at the disasters which befell Real Madrid's galácticos - too many superstars with big egos, not enough team players.

There's a very interesting article by Gus Fraser in today's Independent about the hypocrisy of the players' representatives in Cricket Australia - one minute moaning about burn-out, the next pushing the board to release more players for this miserable venture.

  • 57.
  • At 10:30 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • steve wrote:

Hi,
Just a response to all the moaners and complainers about how bad the IPL concept and the damage to beautiful game... common guys give a chance once ... who know it may be as much as successful as footty over here.. footty is a beautiful game and commercialized... so much..

why not cricket if there is a opprtunity to do it

  • 58.
  • At 10:50 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ed wrote:

Never has the extent of the poverty gap been so apparent in India. I really hope these players give their money to charity or at least put the money back into the game. Otherwise it makes the whole competition seem like a joke, in which the laughter is squarely aimed at the all-too-easily manipulated Indian public. Equally, I hope these outrageous salaries reflect the level of commitment of the players, and not the inverse.

  • 59.
  • At 10:51 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Faustino wrote:

"You pay peanuts, and you get monkeys ..." Presumably there'll be no more "monkey" chants to high-priced Symonds.

  • 60.
  • At 11:21 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • James Crompton wrote:

Early contenders for winners of this tournament would have to be Kolkata - what a fantastic day's bidding!

They've picked up some established tee-off merchants in Gayle and McCullum, a bargain in Punter Ponting (who may be out of form by his own high standards but is still highly dependable) - and the bargain of all bargains, the most under-rated batsman in world one-day cricket at this time, a travesty that he has barely played for his country - in David Hussey. The only problem will be - accommodating them all in the same team!

You heard it here first...

  • 61.
  • At 11:21 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ed wrote:

Never has the extent of the poverty gap been so apparent in India. I really hope these players give their money to charity or at least put the money back into the game. Otherwise it makes the whole competition seem like a joke, in which the laughter is squarely aimed at the all-too-easily manipulated Indian public. Equally, I hope these outrageous salaries reflect the level of commitment of the players, and not the inverse.

  • 62.
  • At 11:22 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Ammad Siddiqui wrote:

What is funny that it is the English who had started the Twenty20 format. What is funny they run the English Premier League, which the IPL is based upon. What is funny that no English player is part of the IPL. How ironic!

  • 63.
  • At 11:37 PM on 20 Feb 2008,
  • Afzal, iqbal wrote:

can,t wait till this series start & people in india are going to become players star card collectors like here in usa!

Just had to jump in. Change is the order of nature. Lets give this a shot. Like the 20 overs format, we may all get some kick out of it. If it fails, we move on. Question is the players have to last a few seasons for the respective teams to build into a Manchester United or Arsenal etc. Pl forgive my knowledge of football. There is so much opportunity that I am requesting my son in law (27) who has an MBA and works for a premier International institution to take up the game again. By the way he played for the state and is a damm good left hand spin bowler. There's plenty of time left. And I am going to take up Cricket Commentary. Seriously!

I am going to take up Cricket commentary and my son in law is going to start developin that doosra. Sorry Teesra! What an opportunity maa'n !

  • 66.
  • At 12:22 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Kevin wrote:

Stop ur whinging all of u....there are so many positives for the IPL and they should be looked at and not the negatives.

1. IPL will bring unity between the countries....The Aussie- Indian rift is no secret and a league like this will bring them closer together and forget their differences.
2. The standard of youth cricket in India is not as good compared to England and Australia, and so with many under 22 players playing with experienced players....they would improve and so would the future of Indian cricket.
3. Entertainment- need i say more.
4. With all this Cricket being a business issue.....Every single sport is a busines....doesn't mean theres no passion in it. Crickers and businessmen can still be passionate and make money.

  • 67.
  • At 12:30 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Mander wrote:

Great for the game of cricket. Cricket when compared to Golf ,tennis, soccer and basket ball etc. has been short changed as far as earnings by players are concerned. Indians love cricket and if there is a league which can help cricketers make some money, why not?
Make hay when the sun shines. No one knows about the future of IPL, but its good for now. Good luck to all cricketers.

  • 68.
  • At 01:24 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • makmahesh wrote:

I will only add to Ed's (67) comment. As an Indian having worked for four decades in manufacturing and having travelled in Southern India photographing the beauty and poverty in Indian Villages, I feel ashamed at this circus. These biddings are being done by Corporates - whatever happened to Corporate Governance. When most of the Indians earn less than $ 2 per day for a maximum of 180 days a year, these spoilt brats will be laughing all the way to the Bank. No chance of any of them giving even 10% of their earning to NGO Charities. The conclusion the rest of the world can come to is Indians in position of responsbility have lost their rockers

  • 69.
  • At 01:25 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Ronny wrote:

This days cricketers are like a porno stars, they have lots of beautiful"""
choices and why not??? let them enjoy the big gamble of the cricket world.

  • 70.
  • At 01:47 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • makmahesh wrote:

I will only add to Ed's (59) comment. As an Indian having worked for four decades in manufacturing and having travelled in Southern India photographing the beauty and poverty in Indian Villages, I feel ASHAMED at this circus going on in my country. These biddings are being done by Corporates - whatever happened to Corporate Governance. When most of the Indians earn less than $ 2 per day for a maximum of 180 days a year, these spoilt brats will be laughing all the way to the Bank. No chance of any of them giving even 10% of their earning to NGO Charities. The conclusion the rest of the world can come to is Indians in position of responsibility have lost their rockers

  • 71.
  • At 03:00 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • nachi wrote:

makmahesh

Why fault the Indian Crickers for the Ills of the society. Are they responsible for people living in poverty. What this money in IPL will do is inspire people regardless of wherever they come from to take up cricket seriously and make some money out of it.

  • 72.
  • At 03:00 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • sri wrote:

Where does all the BCCI money go ?
IndianinUSA

  • 74.
  • At 05:17 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • SAMI wrote:

This is great for cricket. Why not let cricketers become millionaires overnight? If 17 year old soccer players can make millions why not 37 year old cricketers like Gilchrist? Gilly deserves a BIG payday too. As a Bangladeshi, I am supporting Kolkata. Just sad to see no Bangladeshi stars in the team.

  • 75.
  • At 05:25 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Chris Clarke wrote:

Collingwood the best fieder in the world?? What drugs are you on son. That bloke wouldn't even come close to making the Australia B team... Get serious mate

  • 76.
  • At 05:27 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • SAMI wrote:

This is great for cricket. Why not let cricketers become millionaires overnight? If 17 year old soccer players can make millions why not 37 year old cricketers like Gilchrist? Gilly deserves a BIG payday too. As a Bangladeshi, I am supporting Kolkata. Just sad to see no Bangladeshi stars in the team.

  • 77.
  • At 05:39 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • KK wrote:

Ishant Sharma for 9.5$, Shah rukh gonna be the biggest loser in the end of the day.

  • 78.
  • At 06:15 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • karthikeyan wrote:

i am going to be big fan of ipl.
i love symonds ,hussey,lee very much.

i.it would be better if both symonds and sresanth played in one team

ii.and it is going to be interesting to see both ricky and ishanth in one team.definetly there is going to be friendship between them
this is one of the big thing

let see what comes between ricky and ishant during playing.


remember kolkata has big chance of winning,bcz they have allround performance both in batting and bowling.it resembles like australia team.

chennai,hydrebad,and have chance.
bcz all have great batsmen,w/o proper bowlers.
mohali also have few chance.


but i will bet hydrebad will not win any match,they have formed one team for playing test cricket like kallis,chanderpaul,dravid,jaffer;waste team

since it is going to like t20 world cup.
t20 worldcup became hit w/o any speculation.
and DLF cup is going to like this

  • 79.
  • At 06:28 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • harish wrote:

This is a new begining in indian sport. I understand there is a hell lot of money spent but look at the bright side. we have 7 games on our home stadium where families can go with their kids and have fun. i remember wen i was a little kid and my dad took me to india vs pakistan it wa a xperince i will never forget..but sadly we have only one game per yr. It all depends now on how the bcci and the franchises market the idea to the common masses and attract crowd.if there is no turn out it will not have that atmosphere and it will flop like icl.. anyways dhoni is playing for us. so me and my buddies will be cheering him on!

  • 80.
  • At 06:56 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • A. Bose, USA wrote:

This is nothing other than irrational exuberance. Cricket is played by only handful of countries, and thus India does well in this sport. In any other sports it's performance is dismal at best. There is no point of paying huge sum of money to this over bloated pigs(Players). BCCI should spend money on impoverished area to promote other social issues such as poverty, after all this is our money.

  • 81.
  • At 07:22 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Shiv wrote:

Read the 8.97pound for Collingwood ,it made me sad to read frivolous comments on a ±«Óãtv forum.As an Indian, I will be over joyed to see the Ashes winning team of England2005 ( with Monty ) in India at any time.I am sure Freddie,Kevin,Monty will be huge hit in my country.Personally I like to watch Ian BELL who reminds me of classical cricket as it should be played.

  • 82.
  • At 07:23 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Bithika wrote:

I am an Indian and I am a big fan of my team but there is something which I hate to think. Was the T20 World Championship fixed?? Was India winning the championship a planned move to promote T20 in India?? With all the money pouring in through IPL for T20, it makes you wonder.....

  • 83.
  • At 07:49 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Vik wrote:

I wonder what would have been the price tags of these players if the franchises weren't capped at $5million per team.Someone here mentioned Collingwood making 8.97 mil;I doubt that would have happened , but a Michael Clark , Pietersen or a Flintoff could have made that a reality had they been available during that period and had the bids not been capped at $5mil.Looking forward to the matches to begin and the next year's auction minus the cap.

  • 84.
  • At 07:55 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • N, Ethirveerasingam wrote:

The IPL is following the US Football. Baseball, Basketball, ice hockey format. The Twenty-20 suits that system. IPL is now a multi-national sports corporation. No more countries cricket. Only cities cricket and the system will be a world system not a country system. World championships will be from a city team with players from cities around the world. No more patriotic country flag waving rubbish. Indian Premier League will grow into the International Premier League. Get on board or be left behind. US one million dollars for a player will be chicken feed by the time the Olympics come to London.

  • 85.
  • At 08:47 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Paul wrote:

Very poor reporting:
"Hundreds of millions" was actuallly nearly US$42 million.
"India was slow to embrace Twenty20 cricket initially but that all changed when they won the inaugural Twenty20 World Championship in South Africa in September and interest in the shortest format of the game suddenly exploded.

The Board for the Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) was then quick to catch on to the money that could be made and has hastily arranged the IPL, with the International Cricket Council's blessing."

No it was in response to the Indian Cricket League (ICL)

  • 86.
  • At 08:56 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Mohan wrote:


So we are about to kill cricket the way we killed football? How depressing - someone needs to stand up to BCCI for being the bully boys. Now what chance of that with money talking..?

  • 87.
  • At 09:05 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Paul Slade wrote:

Although it will not be purist Cricket it will be an excellent spectacle. If you do not like this type of cricket, stop complaining and reach for the remote control, if you do, great, watch and enjoy!

  • 88.
  • At 09:07 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Dan D wrote:

to Tim S - Andrew Symonds does his fair share in the field. did you his catch against Sri Lanka a few days ago? It's a big call stating Collingwood is the best fielder in the world!

  • 89.
  • At 09:29 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Ritesh wrote:

Oh my God.... Cricket players been Sold Off, Auctioned to Movie stars and Businessmen...... World this is India Cricket... and all those have SOLD OFF have No Shame.....
See they play only for money and NOT FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
A movie star what he about Cricket and he Sits on a Table and Bids for Players.
Are there any ENGLAND PLAYER IN THIS.
These players have lost their respect by getting SOLD OFF.....
I make 2800 pounds per year and see what they earn in 15 days.....
I work hard for my money and these players get money for nothing....only playing.... All this money will be of no use to them... mark my words.....
Example a Rookie who is just 19 years old will earn 1 lakh per ball he bowls......
These players have SOLD their MIND, BODY, RESPECT and their SOUL......
ICC wants money.... what has it done to stop it..... Twenty20 should be banned....
If ICC is more interested in Money then I have only one thing to say to ICC. "Thanks for Spoiling a Gentleman’s Game".
God bless you all for spoiling.
BCC should make this a Global issue...

  • 90.
  • At 10:40 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Joanna wrote:

Honestly, being an Indian, I think this is such a waste of money which could be used to develop the poorer areas of the country rather than splash out on buying cricketers!! They are getting a bit carried away with this whole thing!!

  • 91.
  • At 10:42 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Ed wrote:

Never has the extent of the poverty gap been so apparent in India. I really hope these players give their money to charity or at least put the money back into the game. Otherwise it makes the whole competition seem like a joke, in which the laughter is squarely aimed at the all-too-easily manipulated Indian public. Equally, I hope these outrageous salaries reflect the level of commitment of the players, and not the inverse.

  • 92.
  • At 11:12 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Richard Lancaster wrote:

Sorry chaps who don't like this, this is the future. You only have to look at the English game, county championship matches watched by one man and his dog and t20 games sold out match after match. The public have bought into the new version of the game and why wouldn't they? It is much more accessible to the average punter. I predict in 10 years or so we will have a world club game based around this format similar to football. I think it will be great to have this, Cricket needed something as there just aren't enough teams in the world game at the same level...

  • 93.
  • At 11:52 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • John wrote:

Um...Collingwood, even if it ain't the best, is up there pretty high on the list. Symonds is a sad little boy compared to the Red-Haired Assassin of Durham. I have to agree -- the knocking of English players here really beggars belief.

  • 94.
  • At 11:53 AM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Paul wrote:

Cricket is going the Football way.
It can only be good. Living in UK and watching EPL, the quality of games are fantastic. Unfortunately, money speaks. Who can blame the players..
There are people sleeping rough here in UK as well while Beckham earns 1 million $ a week. I'm sure he's not feeling guilty, neither the British citizens who pay to watch the games.
Comments about poverty etc is irrelevant. We should have the maturity to come out of the colonial mindset and enjoy the games. I'm sure the English players are feeling left out. Freedie's comments- sour grapes mate!!

  • 95.
  • At 12:12 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • raghavendran krishnaiyan wrote:

I dont think it is much worse thing happening in Indian cricket than what is happening in football in UK.

  • 96.
  • At 01:05 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Max wrote:

Are people being serious on here......
disguesting?? death of cricket? disaster?? greedy,cash hungry cricketers???

Please have a closer look at the entire situation. True that the BCCI is milking this for all its worth, but I cant understasnd how the IPL could be determental to the game.

Firstly, after all these years of the same montonous tours we've been witnessing, this is a welcome change. How many more 5 test match series and 7 one dayers can we take...
Secondly, it is finally time the cricketers earned some decent money. Apart from the Indians who get paid handsomely(mainly due to fat endoresement packets), none of the others get paid remotely as much as a professional athlete playing at the elite level.
Compare the money being through around in football, golf, tennis...even darts and snooker. Top cricketers who've been sweating blood for all these years and given us entertainemtn can do with a quick buck. No problem whoatsoever in that. Give the likes of Gilly, McGrath,Fleming,Kallis,Chanderpaul, Jaysuria etc a big pay day.. Im all for it.

Bottom line. Its more entertainemnt. Its only 50 days. Players get paid some money finally. Cricket fans get to see some different teams and dynamics we've never seen before. Warne bowling to Pointing...Afridi handling Shoib,Boucher keeping to Kumble..Ganguly captaining Pointing etc...
Its all good fun and a welcome change from all the usual stuff we've been watching year in and year out. Times have changed and cricket has changed too.. Stop being so stuck up..

  • 97.
  • At 01:31 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Jeremy wrote:

So so sad. Another sport giving up its ethos for the sake of money. Unstoppable, of course, and nobody can blame the players (and the subcontinent bookies must be having a field day). This probably won't help test match skills one iota but that seems to be the way the game is now evolving. I dare say that one day in the future all professional matches will be no longer than a day's duration.

  • 98.
  • At 02:44 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Dee wrote:

Agree with Max.
But some issues we need to consider here are,
Will it lead to early retirements , less interest in international cricket?
Will it be as interesting as it is now for years to come?
Will the players play with same passion as they would for their country?
Will the fans have same passion as they do for india/or the country they support?
Only time will tell..

  • 99.
  • At 03:12 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Shenzy wrote:

Go Chennai Go!!
We are going to win this with Dhoni and Murali!!

IPL is here to stay and would improve the lot of cricket and cricketers around the world esp. for youngsters in India. Lets give it a chance. Think also of how much the common man and others revolving around cricket would earn through this IPL..right from the man selling chai outside the MAC stadium to the man selling bats in a sport store..all adds up to the fun...
People in and out of the stadiums making money..stadium facilities would improve in cities..

Maybe we should have a second division too like the Championship here and 2-3 teams getting relegated and promoted..Oh What fun!!

  • 100.
  • At 03:38 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Shenzy wrote:

1) Good for young budding talent in India to rub shoulders with the best in the cricketing world.
2) Everyone makes money out of it...right from man selling chai outside the stadium to Shahrukh Khan
3) Entertainment value
4) Good to see top class players of different countries playing as a team..truly going global..
4) Love to see if we have something like a Championship (Division 2) where the teams would be promoted / relegated every year.
Is this asking for too much too early :-)..

Go Chennai Go!! IPL is here to stay and lets enjoy it!!
We are going to win this with Dhoni and Oram 's "Machine Gun Power" and Murali 's "Looks and Guile"!!

  • 101.
  • At 03:59 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • zia wrote:

i think Shahid Afridi is also a Million Dollar person but the icon players situation denied his amount.

  • 102.
  • At 09:23 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Glynne Williams wrote:

I don't have a problem with improving the lot of youngsters in India; it's well known that the superstars of Indian cricket earn obscene amounts of money compared with others in the provinces.

What wasn't required was this disgusting slave auction.

I wish you joy of it. I'm glad the England players are so exhausted and play so much they can't even think about it (though I'm not holding my breath on that one - someone will break ranks I suppose).

If this sort of cricket becomes the way forward, I will stop even bothering to watch it. By the way, I'm female and have many cricket relatives and ancestors.

  • 103.
  • At 10:40 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • Ravi wrote:

I am an Indian and I feel disgusted to see the way whole IPL auction went and the amount money being pumped-in. This is a ridiculous flaunt of money and power by BCCI and other industrialists. It will greatly help India even if a miniscule percentage of total money these people have gifted to individual players in the name of contract goes to provide education and infrastructure for under-privileged people in India. What we need most is better education, infrastructure and proper sanitation and certainly not this brand of T20 Cricket.

  • 104.
  • At 11:51 PM on 21 Feb 2008,
  • xxxCORRECTxxx wrote:

Why is everyone saying the players are turning their backs on their Country's etc etc...it's a 4-week tournament. You don't say a player hates his Country every time he turns up for a county game or plays a season at Kent or Somerset. What's the difference?

International cricket is chock-a-block full of (endless) ODI's (scorned as pajama cricket for its troubles) and even in England, a place which refuses to believe anything other than Test cricket in front of 5 men and a dog is the real thing - people only seem to care about the Ashes. So really, when we think only 25 days of cricket every 2.5 years is worth taking an interest in I can't see what the complaints are about 4-weeks of quality, enthralling Twenty-20 every year which will be great viewing and will put (a lot of ) bread on the top players tables.

  • 105.
  • At 10:37 AM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • Rahul wrote:

Just nationalism gone wild in India, this is not even real cricket just a glorified hitting contest aim at the poor masses. Perfect for the modern world of little time and attention span but bad for the purists.

Also notice how the Indian sides didn't bid high on the Pakistani players - I guess the complex still exists - just not talked about in this PC world of ours. I found this quite shameful really.

  • 106.
  • At 11:10 AM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • chris fenton wrote:

I think this is a wrong thing to do for cricket. It hs turned out to all be about money. Just think players will retire earlier becuase of it and wont feel the need to play international cricket and also not so many international stars will play as overseas cricketers in county cricket. Once again England have created a game and to be honest we nto that great at it! I hope the ICC stop this after the first year to save cricket.

  • 107.
  • At 11:11 AM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • nishant wrote:

Ah it's so sad cricket has lost blue blood Glynne Williams.

I hope some of the IPL heroes win her over again..

  • 108.
  • At 11:55 AM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • Rod Smith wrote:

Nothing has been said here as to how much the people will have to pay to enter the grounds. If the entry price is too high it's simply a TV thing. Then for the TV viewers the games will lack atmosphere as we saw in West Indies (World Cup) until (halfway through) the ICC saw the light and made the admission fees at the grounds reasonable.

  • 109.
  • At 02:25 PM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • doodah wrote:

Those who feel that this is degrading the game of cricket and all its perceived 'gentleman-ness' are living in the dark ages. We are living in the now and future. Things are changing all the time, and we have to live with the times. The IPL can only bring the game forward and in line with other 'professional' games. If it is envy or jeolousy that make people wince seeing how much class cricketers can make, then I suggest that they should use this as motivation to be good enough to join their ranks rather than whinge about degrading the game.

  • 110.
  • At 02:59 PM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • Anonymous wrote:

all these 'leagues' are just killing cricket. and this is no different. persoanlly i see nothing interesting in this but a bunch of suparstar players, ridiculas amount of money and heavy media attention

  • 111.
  • At 06:11 PM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • dave wrote:

would west indies players be part of this ?

  • 112.
  • At 10:10 PM on 22 Feb 2008,
  • Devon (West Indies) wrote:

For Ritesh: If you are so fed up with your salary, why don't you give up your job and go play cricket if you think you deserve what these guys earn? I hate it when we criticize other people's salaries without being willing to do what they do for it...

For Dave: Wwest Indies does have Chris Gayle, Shiv Chanderpaul and Ram Sarwan in... we are not like you English blokes... and had the great Brian Charles Lara not play in the ICL, he would have been the highest bid!

For all: You criticize a team for paying $1.5 million for a cricketer but do not criticize EPL football teams for paying 20, 000 GBP PER WEEK to very ordinary players by world standards; neither does MacLaren get criticized for what they are paying Lewis Hamilton!

  • 113.
  • At 11:12 AM on 23 Feb 2008,
  • dipendra wrote:

i need more other players like peterson,mohammad asraful to participate in chenai that becomes more
perfect and can easily win the ipl because,they are only looking for the old one and paid huge amount of money.
People all over the world surprise that
how only India can rules about the ipl
solid neither other countries

  • 114.
  • At 08:03 PM on 23 Feb 2008,
  • Sohail Ahmed wrote:

England's players don't belongs to IPL as IPL is doing business with only Heroes and Headliners.
Have nice cup of tea.....

This post is closed to new comments.

±«Óãtv iD

±«Óãtv navigation

±«Óãtv © 2014 The ±«Óãtv is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.