±«Óãtv

« Previous | Main | Next »

Privacy Commission Day 1, Witness 1: Hugh Tomlinson QC

Post categories:

George South | 19:40 UK time, Monday, 13 June 2011

Hugh Tomlinson


Giving evidence on Day 1 of the PM Privacy Commission is Hugh Tomlinson QC, who has acted in many of the most high-profile privacy cases of the past year


In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

commissioners

The PM Privacy Commission: Baroness Liddell, Sir Michael Lyons (Chair) and Lord Faulks QC, with PM Editor Joanna Carr

Transcript to follow.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    How long does this PM privacy commission run for?

  • Comment number 2.

    Can radio 4 discover how many gagging injunctions have been issued since 1980?
    i.e. before and after H.R.A. under Freedom of Information ?
    How long do they last? Must the recipient wait for the death of the ex parte?
    It was vaguely refered to as 300 p.a. by one legal presenter
    The simple gagging injunction does not seek to gag the press it forbids the recipient to communicate and inform. This means excemption from enquiry by Authorities.
    c.f. The F.S.A. cannot say who paid for a certain injunction even if it was funded by the tax payer. Naturally anyone who uses funds to protect themselves should be open to Inland Revenue and F.S.A. My experience is that even Registrars in R.C.J. will not continue if a previous gagging order is produced.
    Please could the injunctions be classified into those to protect a professional practice(legal),to protect a celebrity reputation, to protect commercial standing,pension etc. I have wondered if when a storm is brewing e.g. like the off shore tax troubles that were beginning to flame at the election, died down when it was realised that it would not look good if the government was renting buildings for which the tax payer would not receive even the tax and VaT from the offshore landlords Did they take out injunctions?
    The terms gagging and super while descriptive do not have a legal definition

  • Comment number 3.

    And the transcript will follow when?

  • Comment number 4.

    Would a gagged individual face a spell in prison if they gave evidence without the paid help of Max Clifford

  • Comment number 5.

    Please will the Questioners ask each witness How many injunctions have they actually seen? Not how many have they instigated, or received, but how many can they swear exist?
    Perhaps they are a fee raising myth of the legal Profession

Ìý

±«Óãtv iD

±«Óãtv navigation

±«Óãtv © 2014 The ±«Óãtv is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.