[John Keller] Ducks
I'm John Keller and this is my web area. As you can see after years of correspondence (inc. urine samples) the ±«Óãtv has finally agreed to broadcast my Truth(TM) - I hope not too late.
CV (Curriculum Veritatis)
I was a successful record company executive until the first of my nine main revelations. After the fourth one ("El Biggie"), I parted company with EMI and have washed up here as the ±«Óãtv's Truth Correspondent.
Now, with my colleague Helen Atwill, I am working undercover in this psychiatric institution to show how the Powers are marginalising truthspeakers with the label "mentally ill." The ±«Óãtv has agreed to serialise our findings (see clip, below) but to preserve then from interference by Powers they cannot be broadcast on the terrestrial networks - thankfully cyberspace is still safe from the controlling lunacy of cranks, so these will be going out on the ±«Óãtv Truth Online website.
Helen and I are posing as Doctor and Patient and she has even come up with a 'condition' for me - fun! The food is not great here but the ethos is 'indoorsy' - which suits me.
Bulletin 1: 01 Feb 2010 AD
Now, read on for the Case Notes of Dr Helen Atwill...
Case Notes of Dr Helen Atwill (DPsych (Prof), MSc, BD, AKC, MTh, UKCP)
Initial interviews with Subject going well. On a personal note I feel conflicted that Subject's condition should be broadcast publicly but as ±«Óãtv Psychiatry Online have been supporting this important research there is no choice - in any case I had underestimated his ability to post-rationalise his circumstances. He seems, for example, to have convinced hmself that these clinical records are in fact his own personal "web area."
Owing probably to his personal history in the music business, The Brit Awards have been preoccupying JK this week and in the clip you can see he is quite definite about the Outstanding Contribution Award.
Here is the graph he produced this week measuring the number of ducks in Howard Donald's name - as you see, "literally off the chart":
Transcript: supplementary Q&A
Dr Atwill: John, in our interview you discussed Jason Orange's future career as a radio Disc Jockey - you referred to this as a Bilderberg project. Can you back this up at all?
John Keller: Not only can I back it up, I can back it up, park it and empty the boot. And check the tyres:
Fig 1.
P was measured as a function of n for the period JUL 2008 (J) - MAY 2009 (M). The girth of the P-ness is fairly narrow, with a low of 16.2 in June 2008 and peaking at 21.3 in April 2009. A bit abstract perhaps? No relevance in the real world?
Fig 2.
This is the Sierra Burana mountain range in Colombia, meeting place of the Bilderberg Group. And let's see what happens when Fig 1 is merged with Fig 2...
Fig 3.
Coincidence? Nope. Those passing this lake may see ducks on it. Which one is a Senator? Exactly.
If you regard the initials of the months in Fig. 1, you will see that they spell out "Jason, DJ, FM/AM" in a career prediction as old as our Gregorian Calendar.
Even five hundred Years ago, Pope Gregory knew that while purebred duckblood Howard Donald would rise to dominate politics in the first of many Bush-Obama-Donald-Bush sequences this century, it would be Jason Orange who would be the voice spreading the lies over the airwaves and spreading the tears of innocents on his sandwiches. Salty, wet, Bilderberg sandwiches.
Observations
Subject's Photoshop skills are respectable but the same cannot be said for his grasp of reality. The combination of 75% analytical logic and 25% wild invention seems to give him an addictive emotional cocktail of apparent mental strength and apparent messianic inspiration, leading to feelings of (a) momentum and (b) importance. This self-experience is so seductive that I cannot yet convince him to sacrifice it for a less satisfying reality.
CV (Curriculum Veritatis)
I was a successful record company executive until the first of my nine main revelations. After the fourth one ("El Biggie"), I parted company with EMI and have washed up here as the ±«Óãtv's Truth Correspondent.
Now, with my colleague Helen Atwill, I am working undercover in this psychiatric institution to show how the Powers are marginalising truthspeakers with the label "mentally ill." The ±«Óãtv has agreed to serialise our findings (see clip, below) but to preserve then from interference by Powers they cannot be broadcast on the terrestrial networks - thankfully cyberspace is still safe from the controlling lunacy of cranks, so these will be going out on the ±«Óãtv Truth Online website.
Helen and I are posing as Doctor and Patient and she has even come up with a 'condition' for me - fun! The food is not great here but the ethos is 'indoorsy' - which suits me.
Bulletin 1: 01 Feb 2010 AD
View the full blog post to access video content. In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions
Now, read on for the Case Notes of Dr Helen Atwill...
Case Notes of Dr Helen Atwill (DPsych (Prof), MSc, BD, AKC, MTh, UKCP)
Initial interviews with Subject going well. On a personal note I feel conflicted that Subject's condition should be broadcast publicly but as ±«Óãtv Psychiatry Online have been supporting this important research there is no choice - in any case I had underestimated his ability to post-rationalise his circumstances. He seems, for example, to have convinced hmself that these clinical records are in fact his own personal "web area."
Owing probably to his personal history in the music business, The Brit Awards have been preoccupying JK this week and in the clip you can see he is quite definite about the Outstanding Contribution Award.
Here is the graph he produced this week measuring the number of ducks in Howard Donald's name - as you see, "literally off the chart":
Transcript: supplementary Q&ADr Atwill: John, in our interview you discussed Jason Orange's future career as a radio Disc Jockey - you referred to this as a Bilderberg project. Can you back this up at all?
John Keller: Not only can I back it up, I can back it up, park it and empty the boot. And check the tyres:
Fig 1.
P was measured as a function of n for the period JUL 2008 (J) - MAY 2009 (M). The girth of the P-ness is fairly narrow, with a low of 16.2 in June 2008 and peaking at 21.3 in April 2009. A bit abstract perhaps? No relevance in the real world?Fig 2.
This is the Sierra Burana mountain range in Colombia, meeting place of the Bilderberg Group. And let's see what happens when Fig 1 is merged with Fig 2...Fig 3.
Coincidence? Nope. Those passing this lake may see ducks on it. Which one is a Senator? Exactly.If you regard the initials of the months in Fig. 1, you will see that they spell out "Jason, DJ, FM/AM" in a career prediction as old as our Gregorian Calendar.Even five hundred Years ago, Pope Gregory knew that while purebred duckblood Howard Donald would rise to dominate politics in the first of many Bush-Obama-Donald-Bush sequences this century, it would be Jason Orange who would be the voice spreading the lies over the airwaves and spreading the tears of innocents on his sandwiches. Salty, wet, Bilderberg sandwiches.
Observations
Subject's Photoshop skills are respectable but the same cannot be said for his grasp of reality. The combination of 75% analytical logic and 25% wild invention seems to give him an addictive emotional cocktail of apparent mental strength and apparent messianic inspiration, leading to feelings of (a) momentum and (b) importance. This self-experience is so seductive that I cannot yet convince him to sacrifice it for a less satisfying reality.
Subject's extreme theories about powerful figures meeting in exclusive groups because of their biological difference (ducks/aliens) are a rationalisation of his own feelings of exclusion: he is excluded not for personal reasons but because he is not a duck. I believe Subject is fundamentally troubled by a sense of his own ordinariness and it is worth noting that his inability to accept life on more moderate terms is problematic because it is extreme - the tendency is universal. HA
John Keller and Dr Helen Atwill are the inventions of .
John Keller and Dr Helen Atwill are the inventions of .
Comment number 1.
At 8th Mar 2010, John Keller wrote:Loving your work, Helen - You're getting this clinical jargon down pat.
Was wondering if I could make a phonecall - I have some information about the Millibands that the press might be interested in. If that's hard to arrange without 'dropping character' I understand. JK
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 8th Mar 2010, Dr Helen Atwill wrote:John, that might be tricky. It remains impressive that you can access the comments since I don't recall giving you the administrator password but might I ask you to restrain yourself - we're trying to help you after all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 8th Mar 2010, John Keller wrote:Are they there in the room? Say no more. But re Millibands, could I give the source material to you? It's in the 'stained dress' format.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 8th Mar 2010, Dr Helen Atwill wrote:I'm not familiar with that format John.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 8th Mar 2010, John Keller wrote:I don't know how to put it more delicately Helen. You are a lady as a well as a faux-Doctor! Think Lewinsky is all I will say!! It's not a dress though it's a small phial - roughly enough to impregnate Manchester, roughly. Tell you what, I'll leave it with Dennis - of all the orderlies he's the one I trust the most. Then Tunde, then Graham, then the Turkish one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 8th Mar 2010, IRW030370 wrote:I'm concerned about the phial John. How was the 'sample' collected? Knowing the Millibands as I do (carnally) there is a distinct possibility that the 'sample' may be infected with digestive biscuit crumbs.
p.s. I may also have something on Quasimodo - but it's just a hunch...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 10th Feb 2011, Web design wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)