±«Óătv

All party talks?

Image caption,
Tony Blair celebrates becoming Prime Minister in Downing Street in May 1997

After winning the May 1997 UK general election, the new Labour government – led by Tony Blair – attempted to get the peace process moving again.

Blair announced that if the renewed its ceasefire, could enter talks.

The PIRA ceasefire was duly renewed on 20 July 1997 and Sinn FĂ©in entered the talks in September 1997, having also signed up to the Mitchell of non-violence.

Sinn FĂ©in’s entry into talks caused potential problems within the movement.

In an effort to ensure that the PIRA did not return to violence during negotiations, a General Army Convention was organised.

This meeting agreed that the PIRA’s Army Council (which the Sinn FĂ©in leadership allegedly controlled) could decide on possible concessions.

Sinn FĂ©in’s entry led to the and the United Kingdom Unionist Party (UKUP) leaving the talks.

Both parties refused even to consider proximity negotiations (meaning they would not have to meet face to face), a position that was not shared by the or the loyalist parties.

Back to top

Negotiations

The negotiations were based around three strands:

Illustration showing the different negotiating strands leading to the Good Friday Agreement 1998.
  1. Strand One would focus on a new governmental structure for Northern Ireland.
  2. Strand Two would be concerned with cross-border relations between the two parts of Ireland.
  3. Strand Three would deal with British–Irish relations.

An Independent International on was also set up under the chairmanship of Canadian General John de Chastelain.

On Friday 10 April 1998, Good Friday, it was announced that agreement had been reached.

In the final stages, not only did Blair and the , Bertie Ahern, join the negotiations, but US President Bill Clinton played his part by telephone.

Back to top

Key terms of the Good Friday Agreement

Illustration showing the outcome to each strand of the Good Friday Agreement negotiations
StrandOutcome
OneEstablished a 108-member , elected by , with full and authority over areas previously administered by the Northern Ireland Office.
TwoCreated a North–South Ministerial Council responsible for cross-border co-operation in a range of areas.
ThreeSet up a British–Irish Council with members from all parliaments/assemblies within the British Isles. Its purpose was to enable consultation and co-operation in a range of areas. Also established a British–Irish Intergovernmental Conference with responsibilities similar to the institutions set up by the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement.

Other terms

Illustration showing other outcomes of the Good Friday Agreement 1998
  1. The Irish government agreed to renounce its claims to Northern Ireland as contained within of the .
  2. The British Government agreed to replace the .
  3. There were also to be prisoner releases, alongside .

The Agreement also established an Independent on Policing, to create a police force that could attract the support of both communities.

Back to top

The responses to the Good Friday Agreement

The and opposition to any deal was already known, however now divisions started to emerge within the .

The first sense of this came when Jeffrey Donaldson – one of the members of the UUP negotiating team – walked out of the talks just as the deal was nearing completion.

In the event, six of the UUP’s ten MPs opposed the Agreement.

In May 1998, anti-Agreement unionists – including these anti-Agreement UUP MPs – set up the United Unionist Campaign to co-ordinate their opposition.

Their slogan was ‘It’s right to say no.’

On 30 April 1998, the announced that the Agreement fell somewhat ‘short of presenting a solid basis for a lasting settlement’, and added that it would not its weapons.

However, a few days later, leaders told their supporters to back the Agreement.

At the party conference (Ard Fheis), members voted to allow members to take seats in the new Assembly.

Back to top

The referendums

On 22 May 1998, were held on both sides of the border to determine the electorate’s support for the Agreement.

Within Northern Ireland, 71.12 per cent of those who voted indicated their support for the Agreement.

The overall turnout was 80.98 per cent, a figure significantly higher than that produced at most elections.

It seemed that close to 97 per cent of supported the Agreement while the comparable figure for was about 52 per cent.

The figures in the Republic were even clearer.

There, 94.4 per cent agreed with the government’s plans to amend of the Irish .

Back to top

The new Assembly

Elections for the new were held in late June 1998.

The results seemed to suggest that a clear majority of members elected supported power-sharing (75 per cent of the votes resulting in 80 out of 108 seats); however this failed to take account of two things:

  1. Not all of the 28 members elected were in favour of the Agreement – even though the UUP was meant to be pro-Agreement.
  2. The Agreement stated that certain decisions required majority support from both and communities. Given the fine balance between pro- and anti-Agreement unionist support, that might be difficult to achieve.

The new Assembly met for the first time on 15 July 1998.

David Trimble, UUP Leader, and Seamus Mallon, SDLP Deputy-Leader, were elected as First and deputy First Ministers (Designate).

For more information, including archive clips, on this subject, visit ±«Óătv: Ten Chapters of the Northern Ireland Troubles ()

Back to top

Test your knowledge

Back to top

More on Changing relations: Northern Ireland and its neighbours, 1965-98

Find out more by working through a topic