Main content

Election: Why is it so hard for blind people to vote in secret?

It’s over 150 years since the secret ballot was introduced in the UK –so why is it still so difficult for blind people to cast their vote in secret?

tv Scotland political reporter Ian Hamilton joins Emma Tracey on this week’s podcast.
Both of them are blind and they discuss why they and other blind people can’t confidently vote in secret.

They talk about the pitfalls of tactile voting templates and share their experiences of polling station staff. They also consider whether technology might offer a solution in the future.

Also on the show: Britain’s fastest deaf swimmer, 25-year-old Nathan Young, on his 1,000 day campaign to persuade politicians to fund his bid to compete in next year’s Deaflympics.

Presented by Emma Tracey
Production by Daniel Gordon and Alex Collins
Recorded and mixed by Dave O’Neill
The editor was Farhana Haider

Is there is an election issue affecting disabled people you think we should be talking about? Get in touch, we really want to hear from you. You can email us mailto:accessall@bbc.co.uk or message @bbcaccessall on Twitter/X or Instagram. Our WhatsApp number is 0330 123 9480, please begin your message with the word ACCESS.

Release date:

Available now

28 minutes

Transcript

11th June 2024

bbc.co.uk/accessall

Access All – episode 109

Presented by Emma Tracey

EMMA- Did you know that people have been able to vote in secret in the UK since 1872? That’s 1872! And I, as a blind person, still can’t confidently cast my vote in secret. What on earth is going on? I actually really need to have a rant with somebody about this so I’m going to bring in tv Scotland reporter, Ian Hamilton. He’s blind like me, and he’s been looking into how on earth, how the devil blind and visually impaired people still aren’t able to vote in secret with confidence on voting day. And just a little bit of trivia for you: the first stamp to seal the first secret ballot was made of liquorice. There you go. On with the show!

MUSIC- Theme music.

EMMA- Hello, and welcome to Access All, the tv’s weekly podcast dedicated to stories about disability and mental health. I’m Emma Tracey, and we’re sticking with the General Election this week – it’s on 4th July by the way. And I’m going to be finding out why blind voters still can’t vote confidently in secret. To talk to me more about that tv reporter Ian Hamilton is going to be telling me why blind and visually impaired voters still can’t confidently vote in secret in the UK, and what can be done to change it. And I’ll be speaking to the UK’s fastest deaf swimmer, Nathan Young, who’s heading off to the Deaflympics next year with potentially no government funding.

When tv Scotland reporter, Ian Hamilton, went to vote at the last elections in Scotland he came up against some barriers. He’s blind, like me, and he struggled to get the help he needed at the polling station. And when he went into the polling booth he couldn’t confidently vote in secret. Now, that is despite new rules by the electoral commission from 2022 which were designed to improve the voting experience for disabled people. Ian Hamilton is with me to tell me more. Ian, we’ve got some jaw-dropping statistics from the RNIB about this. They say that only 13% of blind and visually impaired people were able to vote in secret in the last election. What happened to you exactly when you went to the polling station?

IAN- Well, I went and there’s no reflection on the staff. I always think the staff are really nice and really helpful. But I think every time I go and vote there always seems to be a problem. They never seem to know how to use the template, and they never seem to know even sometimes where the template actually is.

EMMA- What’s the template, for people who don’t know?

IAN- Well, what the template is it’s a plastic sheet, for want of a better word, and down the right-hand side of the template are little flaps with braille and numbers on them, and each number and braille should correspond with the box for each candidate. Now, it’s got to be lined up properly so that you can pull back the appropriate flap and when someone has read it out to you, then you can make your mark independently and in private. You then peel the ballot paper off the back of the template, fold it and put it in the box. So, you know, it is secret.

EMMA- So, someone has to read you the names and then tell you which flap coordinates with which name?

IAN- Yeah.

EMMA- And it’s like a lift the flap book, you lift the flap.

IAN- Yeah.

EMMA- And you put your X in the box. I mean, I’ve used those before and I’ve actually spoiled a ballot paper with one of those templates because it just moved slightly.

IAN- It moved, and they’re meant to stick them down; they’re meant to be slightly sticky, a bit like a sticky note. So, they’re meant to, there’s a bit they peel off the back so it adheres to the ballot paper. But quite often they don’t know how to do it [laughs]. The amount of people that I have trained how to do this over the years since it first came in in, what 2001, when it first came in.

EMMA- Yeah.

IAN- It’s unbelievable. As I say, the staff are always trying to do their best, it’s not that they don’t; but they’re just not shown how to do it. And quite often I feel quite sorry for them.

EMMA- So, is it that the tech available is rubbish, or is it just that they can’t use it properly? Because it feels pretty flimsy to me. I don’t have one in front of me right now, but I remember them well because I remember thinking, is this really it?

IAN- This is as far as it goes. When you think in other countries they can vote electronically, it’s amazing that we can do the most private thing in the world, which is our banking on a mobile or digital device, but we can’t vote. And that to me is where I think we’re falling behind is in terms of the technology that we could use or possibly use.

EMMA- So, do you think that voting should be electronic in the UK?

IAN- I think there’s no reason why not. Now, the new legislation that came in in 2022, you know, it’s not quite as prescriptive as it used to be. It does open it up for innovation, is what Sarah Mackie at the Electoral Commission said to me. So, there are opportunities to try and move this thing forward and try and make it a bit easier, and try and create some new ideas that might make it easier for us in the future.

EMMA- So, what kinds of opportunities have the new rules created then?

IAN- Well, [laughs] they’re pretty basic a lot of them if I’m being honest. But you can now take anyone over the age of 18 into the polling booth with you; they no longer have to fill in a form, which they used to be able to do, to assist you. As long as they’re over 18, it could be a family member, it could be a friend who can assist you to vote, so that’s a new change. Some of the other stuff is pretty basic: the template that we’ve already spoken about; better lighting; better pencil grip for people who have got problems with dexterity; lower booths for people in wheelchairs. It all seems pretty basic as it stands. But I think that’s the basic, and the hope is that this new legislation will maybe open it up to let people come through with new ideas. And I have been told by Sarah that there are some good ideas coming forward for future elections.

EMMA- Well, as you say, you did speak to Sarah from the Electoral Commission. Here’s what she had to say:

SARAH- In 2021 we conducted research after the elections where we talked to people who define themselves as disabled or with a long-term health condition to look at their experience of voting in the election. And we found that their satisfaction with the process was lower than those who did not define themselves as disabled or with a long-term health condition. Every time there is an election you hear really frustrating accounts from individual disabled voters where they’ve turned up to a polling station and actually all the accessibility equipment has been there but the staff don’t know how to use it and how to support them to use it. And that’s the really important thing is to make sure that when it’s there they are ready to use it and to support people to use it.

EMMA- But is it always there, Ian? Because I’ve been reading that you have to send a letter to tell people about your adjustments, to tell your polling station what you need. Is all of the stuff there, or do we actually have to do the work and ask for it?

IAN- No, apparently not. All the stuff should be there in a kit in the polling stations for the electoral officers to use it. Now, anything particularly specialised that might be a bit different, you do have the right or the ability to contact them in advance and say you’d like to use a piece of technology or do something slightly different, and they’ll try and see if they can accommodate it. Now, they don’t have to accommodate it, they don’t have a legal right for you to do that; but they will try and accommodate. But there should be basic equipment there. Like the braille template, for example, for you and me that should be there; that’s part of their kit.

EMMA- Ian, you’ve been out and about talking to blind people about this. How are blind people feeling about the voting process this time?

IAN- I think much the same as you and I. The people that I’ve spoken to say they want to go and vote, they want to go and vote in secret, but they feel there’s kind of a bit of a barrier. And it’s one of the issues we’ve already spoken about, and that’s the lack of training. Are they going to get guided when they go in there? There’s always that doubt that we have when we go anywhere, Emma, whether we’re going on a train or when we go and fly: is the staff going to be trained? And I think that’s a bit of a psychological barrier for people to try and get over. When they say a couple they have been in and it’s been very patchy; sometimes they get help, sometimes they don’t.

EMMA- You spoke to a voter called Sam:

SAM- When I’ve went to go and vote previously I’ve been given these braille cards for me, tactile boxes for me to tick. But the lack of awareness of sighted guides is definitely not there. There needs to be a lot more work for that to be done to have a more accessible environment with staff members at the voting polls.

EMMA- Do you know what’s funny, Ian, what Sam was saying about sighting guiding, the reason why I have quite a good experience in my polling station in that regard is that I always have the same returning officer guide me into my booth, because it’s a really small polling station. But what that also means, because I don’t trust the templates I don’t use them, so I ask the returning officer to put the X in the box for me. So, I’ve had the same person put the X in the box for me for the last ten years. So, whoever she is – I’ve never asked her name, I don’t want to know who she is – but whoever she is knows how I’ve voted for the last ten years.

IAN- Slightly ironically, I know exactly what you’re talking about because neither do I trust that because I’m always double checking, saying, ‘Have you lined it up?’ ‘Oh yes.’ Then you find, ‘Well you lined that box up with that box?’ ‘No. Is that what you’re meant to do?’ ‘Yes, that’s the whole conversation we’ve been through, could you line these up with the boxes’. And even when it’s all done I’ve still got this element of doubt when I walk out of the polling station of whether I’ve actually voted [laughs].

EMMA- You see, I can’t cope with that anxiety! I cannot cope with it. And, I mean even, can I just tell you I don’t know print letters, so putting the X in a box is like an inherently visual task anyway.

IAN- Yes.

EMMA- So, even if it is lined up I’m worried, I’ve been practising my Xs all morning, and I’m worried I’ve done the wrong symbol and they won’t accept my paper. It’s very stressful. What can be done to fix this, do you think?

IAN- Well, it doesn’t have to be an X, it could be any mark. And I don’t see any reason why not, why the actual voting paper, the actual papers themselves couldn’t be embossed in some way so that you could actually feel the box.

EMMA- Yeah, that’s a good idea.

IAN- That would work quite well. And actually there is a piece of device that they’re working on at the moment that might connect or line up better with the ballot paper, and hopefully that will work. But, as I say, I can’t see why we can’t do it digitally. I think that would be an interesting way for us to go.

EMMA- I believe Australia, you can vote by phone. And in Ireland you can ring up and hear all the candidates, but you still have to put the X in the box by lifting the flap. So, there you go. You also spoke to Callum about his experience:

CALLUM- Other visually impaired members I’ve worked with have very, very limited sight, have had no support at getting guided into the polling station. And when they’re in the polling station no one really knows what to do. It can be a really intense and quite upsetting time because there is a lot of pressure around voting sometimes. And I think that if you’re not being supported or being empowered to vote it can really put you off and then build that barrier for people to actually go out and vote.

EMMA- So, that is interesting what Callum says, isn’t it? Like, if you’re not being guided properly into the booth it’s just another barrier for blind people to voting, and then they might not vote. And then the politicians have lost some votes.

IAN- 100%. I think also, you didn’t have it on the clip there, but Callum and Sam said, I wonder if you feel the same as me that actually going out to be seen to vote as a disabled person is really important. I know we can do it as a postal vote but I feel quite strongly, A, as a journalist I like to go and find out what’s going on out in the day [laughs].

EMMA- Yeah.

IAN- But I think also as a disabled person I think it’s important to be seen, to make our democratic representation.

EMMA- Absolutely. I think going to the polling station for lots of people is a big part of the experience. So, we know there are new rules since the last time you voted, Ian. Will it be better this time on 4th July for blind and visually impaired voters?

IAN- Well, Sarah hopes so. She said a lot of the issues in 2021 were because of COVID, that a lot of the staff were focused on trying to make it safe for people to vote, and she’s a bit more optimistic this time. I did say to her, I cannot remember how many times I’ve interviewed Sarah about [laughingly] this subject over the past 20 years, and I said to her as I left, ‘Sarah, with all due respect, I hope I’m not speaking to you again in four years’ time’.

EMMA- Yeah.

IAN- As lovely as she is, I hope we don’t. I think it’s inevitable that there will be some incidents, but let’s just hope that they’re a lot lower than they were last time.

EMMA- So, would you be encouraging disabled people and blind and visually impaired people to go out and vote now that the new rules are in place and now that, you know, the COVID rules have changed etc?

IAN- Yeah, get out and vote and make your mark, you know. I know it can be tough for some people and I know there can be a lot of barriers, even just getting to the polling station can be a barrier for people, having to get public transport there, crossing bad roads, particularly if you’ve lost your vision fairly recently. Not everyone is as cussed as you and I, Emma, about getting out to do the job [laughs].

EMMA- Yeah.

IAN- So, I think we have to take that into account that maybe perhaps people maybe don’t have the same level of confidence, and we have to accept that. But I would say to them even get somebody to go with you if that helps, go in and make your mark, test the system. Because if you don’t things will not improve.

EMMA- Well, you’re quite used to embedding yourself into communities, Ian, because you present a programme on tv Scotland called My Kind of Town. Can you tell us a bit about that?

IAN- My Kind of Town I’ve been doing for a few years now. Basically what we do is it’s a celebration of towns, and it’s quite often towns that are not often featured in TV and radio, communities that maybe get bypassed. You quite often see these programmes where it’s kind of touristy things. We try and get to places that are maybe slightly bypassed for whatever reason, maybe post-industrial towns or towns that maybe are not quite often as seen the in media as they should be.

EMMA- And you spend a week there, don’t you?

IAN- We spend a week there, and it’s good fun spending a week there, and we speak to lots and lots of people. But actually what it’s really about, it’s not really about bricks and mortar, the programme’s really about people and what people do, what they work at, and how they love their communities. It doesn’t matter what issues their communities and towns are facing, how passionately people want to try and make them better, want to improve them.

EMMA- Yeah. And as a blind presenter do you think you bring something extra to a show like that? Do you think you can get more out of people, a different sense of the town than someone else would?

IAN- Yeah, I think you do, I think you do. Because I think, you probably find this yourself [laughs], quite often people will tell you things if you’re blind that the wouldn’t normally tell anybody else, which I think is quite interesting, particularly when there’s a camera there.

EMMA- I like to think it’s just my excellent presenter style, but maybe it is just the blindness. Maybe that is the only reason why I get so much out of people.

IAN- Well, I think people feel quite relaxed sometimes. And it does come down trying to feel and trying to make people feel quite relaxed. Oddly, as you know I’ve got a guide dog, I think quite often it’s the dog that does the trick, not me, and people will chat to the dog. It does open more doors. But I think, we’ve done about 20 programmes now, and as the series has gone on more and more people know about it and they know that we’re not going in there to slag off a town and be horrible about a town. It’s a half full programme, not a half empty one, so we try and look at the best. We don’t ignore the issues, don’t get me wrong, there’s still a bit of journalism in there; but it’s really a bit of a celebration of the town. We don’t go in there to try and castigate them or pull them down.

EMMA- Finally Ian, back to the job in hand, the General Election, what kinds of stories and things will you be looking out for between now and 4th July?

IAN- I think it’s interesting, there are a lot of stories kicking about that will affect all kinds of people with disability. I think welfare is going to be a big subject from whatever party comes in. I think that’s one of the big issues: they’re all going to try and get their welfare bill down, and that’s going to be an issue, people with disabilities come into the fray and how we try and close the employment gap. And there are a couple of other stories we’ve got on commissioning at the moment. If there’s anything of interest to you, Emma, I promise I’ll come and talk to you about it.

EMMA- Thanks Ian, we’d love to have you back. Ian Hamilton, thank you for joining me.

Remember the specialist workshop that I went to for blind women where I learned to do my hair? Well, that was featured on People Fixing the World, which is a World Service radio programme about solutions to the world’s problems. It’s an absolutely great listen. And on that same episode they talked about adaptive fashion for disabled people around the world. Take a listen:

FEMALE- When I set up the brand it was because of my own problems. I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, I couldn’t button myself, like my shirts, because I’ve got limited mobility in my fingers. So, it was because of that I still wanted to be dignified, I still wanted to be dressed pretty, and my fashion sense did not die because of my condition. And I’m not defined by condition.

EMMA- To listen to that whole episode and lots of other episodes on the People Fixing the World feed search for it on tv Sounds or wherever you get your podcasts.

Whilst many elite athletes will be preparing for the Olympics and Paralympics this summer my next guest will be spending another frustrating summer fundraising to get himself to the Deaflympics next year. He holds the esteemed title as the UK’s fastest deaf swimmer. He’s 25, he’s been deaf since early childhood, and when he’s out of the pool he uses cochlear implants. He holds seven national records and won a bronze medal at the 23rd Deaflympics in Turkey in 2017. But despite all of these accolades my guest, Nathan Young, receives no government support to pursue his dream of being an elite swimmer, because being deaf in itself is not one of the criteria which allows you to become a Paralympian. And it’s the Paralympics that receives most of the state support given to disabled athletes. Nathan Young, you are so welcome.

NATHAN- Thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to it.

EMMA- Tell me about the Deaflympics.

NATHAN- So, it’s the pinnacle of every deaf athlete’s career. And obviously I was lucky enough to go and actually win a bronze medal. It’s a very, very proud thing for a deaf athlete to go and achieve. This year it’s the 100 years of the Deaflympics, so it was actually created in 1924 in Paris, and since then it’s just grown and grown and grown.

EMMA- What’s it like there?

NATHAN- Amazing. I absolutely loved it. Obviously getting to see lots of deaf people from all over the world, getting to race and show our talent, I loved every second of it. And hopefully I can go to the next one, which is supposed to be in Tokyo next year.

EMMA- Nathan, how did you start swimming?

NATHAN- I think it was just like any child, they just start swimming just to learn. Ultimately it’s a life skill. And I think I just took it a step too far sometimes. I started to enjoy it more and more. My parents, obviously I found out I was deaf at quite a young age, I was four, so they knew that I might be very self-conscious about having a hearing aid and things like that so they thought, well let’s try and build his confidence in another aspect of his life, and swimming provided that for me. And since then I’ve just achieved a lot more than I thought I would have done. I actually didn’t find out about deaf sport until I was 15. It just shows you the lack of awareness that there is for deaf sport in general. And I think me being deaf you would have thought I’d have known that since a very young age. Whereas everyone knows about the Paralympics and the Olympics.

EMMA- What’s the difference between deaf swimming and regular swimming?

NATHAN- The big one for me is the start. In the UK, or Great Britain I should say, they only have the one light that tells me when to go. I don’t know when to get on the block, I don’t know when to take your marks, and that gives me a massive unfair disadvantage, and I’m always late into the pool. Obviously people say to me but light travels faster than sound, you should be quicker, but that whole sequence of events, getting ready, making sure you’re concentrating on yourself and yourself only, when really I’m just looking to try and find a referee and see if he’s got any movements in his lips so I know he’s saying take your marks, which is quite a stressful thing to do.

EMMA- So, Nathan, obviously you’re deaf so you don’t hear the signal that we hear at the start of each race. In the Olympics and the Paralympics it’s like doo, doo, doo, doooo. And there’s only one light. So, it’s quite difficult for you. Is it different in other countries?

NATHAN- So, when I go to a deaf competition they have the traffic light system, so it’s red: get on the block, orange: take your marks, and green: go. But in this country their system is not compatible with the traffic light system, which I think comes a lot back to the funding aspects. Because if there was funding they would do it, but because they say funding they don’t want to do it. Obviously I’ve done it for years and years, but it’s all those kids coming up that have to deal with the same issues. So, my hoping was that if I can sort this out now they don’t have to go through this.

EMMA- What have you been doing in your campaign?

NATHAN- It just started with a Twitter campaign, just tweeting every single day, just day one, day two of just campaigning the government every single day and tweeting all these MPs to see if we can bring about change. And like you said, it’s been over 1,000 days now, and we have got responses but the response is always, we give 1.2 million to deaf sport. So, they feel like they’ve done their part. But that will never touch an elite deaf athlete, which is quite sad. A lot of my team mates have had to retire much earlier than what they should have because they were struggling to pay the bills and financially prepare themselves to be the best possible shape to race.

EMMA- So, when you won the bronze what was the difference between you and the other deaf athletes in Turkey?

NATHAN- I became really aware of the magnitude of what other countries get compared to us. So, countries like Russia just wipe the floor with most of us really winning everything, because they are a government backed country with the funding for deaf athletes. They’re just treated exactly like the Paralympics; same with Ukraine, same with Japan. So, the main thing that you see is they take a bigger team. Russia will take, like, 30 athletes; we will take about 12.

EMMA- Can you give me a few details of the impact it has on you not having state funding?

NATHAN- So, there are multiple things. Obviously immediately from the get-go I’m at a disadvantage because I’ve not trained as much. Right now if I was not a swimmer I’d be in a position where I’d be working, but because I love the sport so much I wanted to try and sustain a career working in jobs that have allowed me to fit it around my training. But unfortunately I wanted to start getting on the career path because I know that unfortunately the sport is not a career path that’s going to sustain you for life, so I’ve got a new job. That’s taking away time from my training, I don’t do as many gym sessions, I’m not in the pool as much unfortunately. But I think that’s just a sacrifice that a deaf athlete has to take. But then linking it back to other countries, they get paid to train. So, when we come to these competitions I’m standing up on that block in that final, and six out of those eight swimmers are all funded athletes. So, obviously it’s also a mental game of knowing mentally that I’ve not prepared, I’ve got no funding so I don’t go to physios, I don’t get a massage.

And fundraising is a big thing because obviously it might be easier just asking for money, but it takes a lot of time and effort to write the emails, write letters to charities, newspaper articles to ask for funding. So, it takes up a lot of time. And then once you’ve paid for all the accommodation you’ve got to try and do the kit, which I’ve also got to pay for, my racing trunks which aren’t that cheap so I’ve got to pay for them as well. And obviously when I get there sometimes I’ve got to have the money to stay there. For example, I went to Brazil, that’s a long flight so you get a bit of jetlag, so I didn’t have the money to stay there as long as I wanted to so I had to get there quite early and then two days later I’m racing. It’s not enough time to recover and to recuperate. And then, like I said, when I’m on the block I know it’s a mental thing of I know that I’ve not done enough as them to do this race. I know I shouldn’t think so negatively but you can’t help but do that.

EMMA- Why do you think that disabled athletes who aren’t deaf do get state funding?

NATHAN- Deaf athletes in the UK have just fallen down a crack. And obviously lots of deaf people just in the general sense have been made to feel isolated, and I think that this is no different. Now that the BSL Act has come in and there’s more publicity on the deaf community I think that this is a perfect time to now make deaf athletes on par with their Paralympic peers; even though we’re not in the Paralympics, which is not what we want to do, we’re really happy.

EMMA- So, you don’t want to be part of the Paralympics then?

NATHAN- No, it’s not about that. It’s about we are Deaflympic athletes and we’re proud.

EMMA- Nathan Young, the UK’s fastest deaf swimmer, thank you for joining me. And just to clarify what the BSL Act is, it means that BSL has been recognised as a language in England, Scotland and Wales.

Well, there you have it, another episode of Access All almost over. Thank you so much to my guests, Ian Hamilton and Nathan Young. Listen, we are going to be doing a lot more on the General Election between now and 4th July, so do keep your questions and thoughts coming. What should we be asking the political parties? What do you want them to do for disabled people? Should they get into government? Tell us on the WhatsApp, 0330 123 9480. We’re on the socials @tvAccessAll, and we’re accessall@bbc.co.uk on the email. That’s it. Catch you next time. Bye.

PROMO FOR RELIABLE SAUCE

KIRSTY: Reliable Sauce is all about the stories on social media right now – that we love...

JONELLE: Stories that literally everyone is talking about

ARCHIVE: Obviously you are a Jenny - how do you feel about people referring to the general election as the “genny lec”? // Yeah really happy with that...

JONELLE + KIRSTY: Hey hey hey

KIRSTY: I’m Kirsty

JONELLE: And I’m Jonelle

We’re journalists in Europe’s biggest newsroom, working on the tv News TikTok account

KIRSTY: Covering the general election

JONELLE: And, we’re here every week to give the news more flavour...

KIRSTY: with the perfect amount of Sauce

ARCHIVE: Didn't know it was a thing // Yeah it's the genny lec!

JONELLE: Reliable Sauce. Listen on tv Sounds

Podcast

Get the latest episodes of the Access All podcast the moment a new episode goes live!

Podcast