A round-up of what's being said about the ±«Óãtv in other blogs. Today, the announcement of .
Buzzmachine:
"This is a big cultural change for the ±«Óãtv... different tribes are being thrown in together and told they¡¯d better get along." ()
I'm Simon Dickson:
"It's further evidence that online production really isn¡¯t that specialised any more... everything is ¡®just content¡¯." ()
Plasticbag.org:
"Are you impressed by the ±«Óãtv's progress? I'm not." ()
Ninthspace:
"The ±«Óãtv has given new media an expanded role... Great. Now go sort out your interactive TV service!" ()
Blogger John Gibbard has written from the (which took place last Thursday - ±«Óãtv News report ).
He's pretty sure he was ... but if you know otherwise, leave a link in the comments.
A round-up of what's being said about the ±«Óãtv in other blogs. Today, the launch of this site.
CBS Public Eye: "It appears ±«Óãtv News is hopping on the transparency bandwagon." ()
BuzzMachine: "The ±«Óãtv's new editors' blog is another move toward transparency by another big news organization and I¡¯m glad to see it." ()
jamesAntenne: "We¡¯ll have to see what sort of comments make it on to the blog." ()
Quite Random: "Comments on The Editors are peppered with spelling mistakes... everywhere you look, glaringly poor English." ()
The Gorse Fox: "I wonder if the blog will include dilemmas and issues regarding truth and bias." ()
I'm Simon Dickson: "There¡¯s a risk of the editors blog becoming a bit too Points Of View, but another positive step." ()
A selection of comments being made about the ±«Óãtv on blogs around the world...
• Adam Smith Institute: "Some ±«Óãtv staff are reportedly annoyed that which would in the past have been fixed by a couple of workmen in a cradle has degenerated into an expensive and long-running farce" ().
• Idents.tv :"I really like the ±«Óãtv News sets" ().
• Chris Doidge: "The ±«Óãtv is supposed to be 'ours', yet at the moment is greatly detached from society in many respects" ().
• Standing in other people¡¯s shoes: "I love this audience analysis from Newsnight editor Peter Barron - I suspect I might actually be a dedicated loyalist" ().
A selection of comments being made about the ±«Óãtv on blogs around the world...
• Richard H's blog: "When I checked my email just now I found an e-mail titled "Interview request from ±«Óãtv, Today..." ().
• Tom Morris: "What the ±«Óãtv don't seem to understand is that user-generated content is happening all around them" ().
• L'Ombre de l'Olivier: "The ±«Óãtv's "From Our Own Correspondent" used to be a flagship program but right now it seems to be more a flagship example of ±«Óãtv bias" ()
• The Medium is Not Enough: "The ±«Óãtv planned to turn itself into Italian TV for charity" ().
• John Pilger on Comment is Free: "The ±«Óãtv Ten O'Clock News last night wasn't news: it was a series of pronouncements by the spokespeople of the spokespeople" ().
The Times reports that on Monday, News 24 mistakenly interviewed a taxi driver thinking he was Guy Kewney, an expert on the Apple Corps v Apple Computer court case. (, and the real )
This blog aims to explain the editorial decisions and dilemmas faced by the teams running the ±«Óãtv's news service - radio, TV, and interactive. It will feature contributions from ±«Óãtv editors, along with your comments and questions.
The ±«Óãtv wants to be open and accountable, and so this site is a public space where you can engage with us as much as the medium allows. We're happy for you to criticise the ±«Óãtv in your e-mails and comments, and to ask serious, probing questions of us - we'll do our best to respond to them.
Comments on this blog will be moderated. When you submit a comment, we will read it and decide whether to publish it. We aim to include as many comments as we can, but we won't publish any which are abusive, are inappropriate on the grounds of taste and decency, or which appear to be part of a concerted lobbying attempt. There's more on our moderation policy in these House Rules.
Comments should be based around the original post and subsequent discussion. If you want to make a general comment, then please e-mail us instead. We can't promise to respond to every e-mail, but we'll do our best to read them all.
You should also bear in mind that e-mailing us, or leaving a comment on the blog, is not the same as making a formal complaint. If you want to do that, this website will help you - and this way, you're guaranteed to receive a formal response.
For comparison purposes, here are links to some of the rules applied by our contemporaries - , , and in the USA, and and in the UK.
