±«Óãtv

Rather a fun

Comments

1. At 11:57 AM on 05 Sep 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

   I have to say, and this may sound sordid, but the sex session sounds fascinating (at least according to the blurb on the Guardian website, so hey who knows whats REALLY going to happen!)

   I'll be keeping an ear out.

2. At 12:24 PM on 05 Sep 2007, wrote:

   Gordon Brown is absolutely right, we and the US are on the same track in Iraq, what he failed to mention is that we are going in the opposite directions.

3. At 12:24 PM on 05 Sep 2007, wrote:

   Gordon Brown’s description of Prime Minister’s Questions as a ‘debate’ must rank as a hot favourite for the most ludicrous statement of the year prize!

4. At 01:05 PM on 05 Sep 2007, Dr Hackenbush wrote:

   I hope someone recorded the sound of the R4 controller knocking you unconscious, for use as a Sound of the Summer (or for the tribunal?). If not, I don’t know about the implications of trying to recreate this.

5. At 06:48 PM on 05 Sep 2007, country lass wrote:

   sex on radio 4? I am sorry but I don't understand... my husband told me that I had to chose between sex and Radio 4.
   By the way, good interview on Today this morning, and the play was excellent, and isn't it nice to hear Ruth and David Archer getting along better, and....

6. At 10:16 PM on 05 Sep 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Brian (3) Why?

7. At 11:49 AM on 06 Sep 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

   Appers @ 6, maybe Brian meant that Prime Minister’s Questions doesn't come over as a debate very often, if at all?

8. At 01:32 PM on 06 Sep 2007, Simon Worrall wrote:

   In a formal debate there is one theme to be proposed and opposed.

   PMQ's is political theatre, nothing more or less. A string of questioners, one person to give answers which often have nothing whatsoever to do with the question posed.

   I do wish that Mr. Speaker would compel the PM of the day to give direct answer to the question and not dissemble on a theme of his own choosing.

   Si.

9. At 12:05 AM on 07 Sep 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Maybe Fishers (7), but it seems we are not to be told.

10. At 10:37 PM on 07 Sep 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Appers @ 9, I dunno then. P'raps he thinks it proves his point and he need say no more?