±«Óãtv

An otherwise uneventful day yesterday

Comments

1. At 12:44 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Big Sister wrote:

   Oh my word! Just wait til Jonnie sees this ....

   Is this something Beeb employees are forced to do at some time or another?

   Oh, dear. And there was I thinking of Eddie in his kilt. This is something far more shocking!

   I think I need a lie down.

2. At 12:46 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Cr*p photo (hahaha).

3. At 01:07 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

   Cute.

   Is this the so-called 'Baby Doll' look?

   Si.

4. At 01:09 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

   I can die happy now.

5. At 01:15 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Vyle Hernia wrote:

   Is she up for adoption?

   [And I'm not planning to come back about the RC/GR debate as there is plenty to read on Nick Robinson's blog]

6. At 01:30 PM on 26 Jan 2007, The Stainless Steel Cat wrote:

   Mwahahaha! So my De-Age-ifying Ray has struck its first target!

   I now serve warning on you Eddie, if the ±«Óãtv does not hand over one million Blue Peter Badges before 5pm, I will De-Age-ify the entire ±«Óãtv!

   Imagine the chaos:

   John Humphries pulling Sarah Montague's pig-tails!
   (Or vice versa for all I know.)

   Baby Toksvig presenting the Poos Quiz!

   Moneybox will become Piggy Bank!

   Terry Wogan with sideburns again!

   Think on...

7. At 01:35 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Rufus T. Firefly wrote:

   Many thanks Eric for the newsletter. It arrived safely.

   I'm not sure how you're going to interview Stan Laurel. I'll listen this afternnon with interest. According to my records Stan passed away in 1965. He even wrote his own epitaph; "If anyone at my funeral has a long face, I'll never speak to him again."

   Ruf.

8. At 01:44 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

   Sarah Jane as a baby. That was a great one.

9. At 03:29 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Vyle Hernia wrote:

   ...and a giant dummy, as well.

10. At 03:49 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

    To quote Salt'n'Pepper "ooh, baby baby, b-baby baby".

11. At 04:19 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

    Vyle (7): ...and a giant dummy, as well.

    That is hardly fair. The chap is no giant - Sarah-Jane is renowned for her petiteness.

    (My third attempt at getting a comment to pass moderation muster on this thread!!)

12. At 04:25 PM on 26 Jan 2007, RJD wrote:

    Vyle

    No, it's not a giant dummy. Chris Jarvis just looks that size due to the foreshortening effect of the . . .

    (Well somebody had to say it.)

13. At 04:33 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Frances O wrote:

    Vyle (7), just who are you suggesting... no, I won't get suckered.

    I'm a bit sceptical about the royal credentials of the newspaper buggers Eric mentions in the newsletter (yes, I got it!)

14. At 04:34 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

    Please tell me why, I thought you would have by now, I'm desperate!

15. At 04:59 PM on 26 Jan 2007, Fiona wrote:

    Am becoming a little paranoid - have posted two comments today already, none of which have appeared!

    Oh well, 3rd time lucky!

    Will look out for Sarah-Jane in her baby outfit on cbeebies. Must say my son (but more so my SO!) was disappointed Sarah-Jane was not in the cbeebies show at Wembley last month. She was replaced by an equally bouncy smiley one though.

16. At 05:27 PM on 26 Jan 2007, wrote:

    Fiona: Must say my son (but more so my SO!) was disappointed Sarah-Jane was not in the cbeebies show at Wembley last month. She was replaced by an equally bouncy smiley one though.

    I share your SO's pain. And I regret your final sentence is patently impossible.

17. At 01:32 AM on 27 Jan 2007, Valery P wrote:

    Oh, you boys!

18. At 09:11 AM on 29 Jan 2007, Vyle Hernia wrote:

    If you save the picture and then open it with the Windoze Picture Manager, you can adjust the brightness and contrast. When you have done this, the large dummy that Sarah-Jane has hanging around her neck becomes more visible. If Auntie had adjusted the picture before posting it, nobody would have confused the pendant with the person hanging around on our right.

19. At 12:08 AM on 30 Jan 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Oh I so wasn't thinking like a boy when I posted my no.2 above (if you pardon the expression) -- I saw a nappy and thought of poo... the boys clearly saw the lady in the nappy...