Your Letters
17:04 UK time, Thursday, 6 May 2010
Re ... Quite appropriate really.
Chris, Newbury, UK
Re , surely there's been a mix up and we've been given the guidelines for the 1987 general election? That's the only logical explanation for the reference to voters bringing their "ghetto blasters" in.
Tim, Fitzrovia, London
Sorry, did I really read that it's OK to go into a polling station , but that you can't wear a Labour or Tory T-shirt in case it intimidates other voters?
Adam, London, UK
This will be only the second time since the late 90s when I *haven't* voted barefoot - no-one's ever noticed, never mind complained.
Ian Oliver
As an enhancement to the Name Game of the , I suggest that after the second round where you can only use three words to describe your person, add a further round which uses only mime. Hours of fun guaranteed.
Margaret, Christchurch, NZ
What's a ? Is it to help disabled birds cross the road?
Jenny, Chicago
Is it bad that I squealed with utter joy with I read that ?
Liam, Northampton
Monitor note: Who wants to start?
Adam (Wednesday letters), should I point out that volcanoes generally have their own natural funnel, so adding another one on top might not do a lot of good?
Dan Wilkinson, Chesterfield, UK
Sue (Wednesday letters), in the interests of empiricism, I tested your suggested chat-up line last night. Unhappily for you, but happily for me, I am able to report it was probably my most successful line ever. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Rob, London, UK
Andrew (Wednesday letters), I couldn't deny you anything with a genius sense of humour like that. I'll get my coat (you've pulled).
Clare, Connecticut, US
The 
