±«Óãtv

±«Óãtv BLOGS - Magazine Monitor
« Previous | Main | Next »

Your Letters

16:20 UK time, Monday, 27 November 2006

How come nothing has been said about the , forcing BA to reinstate the lady who wanted to wear her cross? Money speaks indeed! Bravo, Rowan Williams.
Jonny, Toronto, Canada

Were his trousers OK? It's the first question that came into my head when reading that lightening had struck a man's house (). If it wasn't for the ±«Óãtv and its sharp news judgement I would never have known - and not knowing would have ruined my day, month, even year. The licence fee is money well spent in my opinion.
Gail, Barnsley

Re: Blair and the slave trade. Surely "deep regret" would be more appropriate and believable than "deep sorrow"?Roger Spruce, Market Weighton

Curse you! I really want a now.
Sarah, Edinburgh

How strange, in your article detailing the , all the entries in the top 10 are discussed except number three - One Night in Paris - which is curiously not mentioned. I wonder why...
Dave, Southampton

Why are ? Easy, their highest goal is bowling a maiden over.
Jel, Swansea

Re: the Times's new font. The word font has been hijacked from the printing trade and is now used rather loosely to refer to the type-face. Originally a font was a physical collection of type of the same face and size. Therefore, to set copy with display headings and phrases in bold type, the type setter would need at least three fonts.
Wendy, Sussex

Paper Monitor, please don't abandon us! I can understand the tediousness of having to describe yet another Diana Monday story in the Express, but think about the joy you bring us. As you point out, life could be worse. You could, for example, be pipetting cow faecal samples in the breaks between reading PM.
Sarah, Edinburgh

Am I the only person who occasionally manages to miss a few lines when scanning through a webpage? I nearly fell off my seat reading 10 things when I saw "George Bush is the first president since Jimmy Carter not to drop off during sex". Sadly, the separated entries make much more sense. Well, the first one does.
Craig Donald, Chiswick, London, UK

I am the only one who, even though I know that there are 10 things in each photo every week, still proceed to count them, just in case? Is there a flexicon entry for pointless counting of objects?
Steve Elsworth, Nantwich, UK

Re: a flexicon word when the picture matches a word but not the story - "pictitious".
Elizabeth G, Galveston, Texas

If Ian Dowie can get "bouncebackability" put in the dictionary, then surely the ±«Óãtv can get "Punorama" in there. I say it's time for a campaign.
Nick Comber, Kent, England

Reading your article on - I was struck by the sheer length of the story and gave up reading half-way through.
Stoo, Lancashire, UK

Has the Magazine stopped offering mid-week quizzes? There has been a distinct lack of them in the past 10 weeks or so, which is a great shame because they are interesting and educational, and one of the main reasons why I look at the Magazine.
Andrew Pearce, London
MM note: 1,000 apologies. We hope to rectify the situation soon.

±«Óãtv iD

±«Óãtv navigation

±«Óãtv © 2014 The ±«Óãtv is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.